Cisco's UC-One (formerly BroadSoft) is a Unified Communications as a Service platform that allows users to work from desktops, tablets, desk phones, or smartphones, and move between devices. UC-One includes business phone services, messaging, audio and video conferencing, screen sharing, file sharing, virtual meeting rooms, etc. which are integrated in the UC-One Hub interface.
Cisco announced their acquisition of BroadSoft in October 2017.
N/A
Lifesize CxEngage
Score7.8 out of 10
N/A
CxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and
work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises
solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility
across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work
anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.
$85
per month per user
Pricing
Cisco UC-One
Lifesize CxEngage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco UC-One
Lifesize CxEngage
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cisco UC-One
Lifesize CxEngage
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
High quality audio
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
High quality video
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Calendar integration
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting initiation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Record meetings / events
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Live chat
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
5.0
1 Ratings
45% below category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
User authentication
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
6.7
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Directory of employee names
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Answering rules
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call recording
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call park
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call screening
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Message alerts
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business SMS/External Messaging
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Fax
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Voicemail Transcription
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Unified Communications Platform and Collaboration
Comparison of Unified Communications Platform and Collaboration features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
10.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Centralized communications management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team messaging
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team document sharing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call and meeting analytics
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
Feature
Cisco UC-One
-
Ratings
Lifesize CxEngage
6.9
2 Ratings
20% below category average
Agent dashboard
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Outbound response
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Call forwarding
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Interactive voice response
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
REST APIs
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Call tracking
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Multichannel integration
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
CRM software integration
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Cisco UC-One and Lifesize CxEngage
UC-One is an extremely versatile app that works well in literally a single user shop, or a multi-hundred user company - especially for those who need mobility options to conduct business properly. With its built-in collaboration features, built-in softphone, and just general instant messaging features it allows you to work literally anywhere you have an internet connection. It is also handy in case there are onsite issues preventing you from using your hard phone (such as power or internet issues) where your cellphone will allow you to continue to work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
quicker data/historical report retrieval
way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We moved to Cisco UC-One because we wanted an integrated program to provide unified communication services as well as the ability to meet, message and share documents. The cost differential was minimal when you realize the time and convenience of Cisco UC-One. Our team down load the app to their cell and have one fewer device to carry, too.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info