TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul vs. SecIntel Threat Intelligence

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACisco's Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul (formerly Fluidmesh, acquired by Cisco July 2020) is presented as an ultra-reliable, low-latency wireless backhaul for OT and IT mobility and fixed applications.N/A

    SecIntel

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/ASecIntel, from Juniper Networks, enables the threat-aware network with a feed of aggregated and verified security data that’s continuously collected from Juniper and multiple other sources. It delivers regularly updated, actionable intelligence to SRX Series firewalls, MX Series routers, Juniper wireless access points, and EXSeries and QFX Series switches.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless BackhaulSecIntel
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless BackhaulSecIntel
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless BackhaulSecIntel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless BackhaulSecIntel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    Cities where there are historical places that can't be destroyed by civil works. CURWB can help to deploy fast communication without fiber.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    It is well suited in cases if you want good threat intelligence software that can collect data from multiple sources. A tool with threat logging and detection/enforcement capabilities that enable you to identify, monitor passively, and block known threats at the firewall. Although it is very costly compared to its competitors it is worth it in terms of the functionality it provides to organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • It has a very low delay compared to other Wireless Technologies for p2p communications.
    • It is reliable even when it works within a band already used for other technologies.
    • It is secure, the communications is encrypted.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Feeds on malicious IP, URLs and domains.
    • Infected host and custom threat feed.
    • Allows data from third party sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • It could have a dashboard for monitoring performance of the communication.
    • The dashboard is simple to use but it can be improve on the UX/UI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Free trial / free version should be there.
    • Licensing cost should be less.
    • Customer support service can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    Since Cisco acquired Fluidmesh, they are deploying new and better features that can be very useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Most of the clients are public.
    • There is a breach on private sector in our country.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Increase in compliance with regulatory requirements.
    • Increase in customers and clients trust.
    • Overall organization security posture has been improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots