TrustRadius

Citrus Framework vs. FitNesse

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Citrus Framework
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The Citrus Framework is a base framework for automated integration tests. It provides integration with multiple transports such as Apache Kafka, Http REST, JMS, TCP/IP, SOAP, FTP, SSH, XML, JSON, etc. One single test is able to act as both client and server on several messaging interfaces. Citrus provides validation of XML, Json and plaintext message content and integrates with Spring features such as security, database connectivity, producer and consumer…N/A
FitNesse
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
FitNesse is an open source fully integrated standalone wiki web server and acceptance testing framework.N/A
Pricing
Citrus FrameworkFitNesse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Citrus FrameworkFitNesse
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Citrus FrameworkFitNesse
Best Alternatives
Citrus FrameworkFitNesse
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Citrus FrameworkFitNesse
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Citrus FrameworkFitNesse
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Useful and straightforward. Appian and other low-code BCM tools can be easily integrated. Writing a script for a test is similar to writing a script in English. So simple to use because it's a wrapper class for selenium. FitNesse is being implemented with the goal of doing it correctly the first time. As a result, migrations of both the client and the server are made easier.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
  • Easy to install.
  • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
  • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
Thapani Sawaengsri | TrustRadius Reviewer
Thapani Sawaengsri
Appian Developer
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
  • Logging can help any debug or error issues.
  • A Java/Selenium developer is needed to maintain the FitNesse keyword library.
  • Content.txt and properties.txted need to be added to the test suite in older versions to make it visible in a test run.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. FitNesse, including its installation, may be utilized with a minimum of fuss and difficulty. Maintaining scripts and monitoring their output is designed to be a relatively straightforward process.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Open Source
  • It does not necessitate any further setup or configuration.
  • FitNess is an easy-to-use manual QA tool with a comprehensive report that aids stakeholders in better understanding the tested applications.
  • Automated testing suites for a wide range of websites. In addition, it is quite beneficial for the ongoing maintenance of the test library.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots