TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Claude Code

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AClaude Code is an AI-powered coding assistant and CLI tool that helps developers to build features, fix bugs, and automate development tasks. Available for download on Windows, Mac, or Linux, it is accessed through credit purchase, or (in somewhat limited supply) through a subscription to Claude.N/A

    Cursor

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/ACursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.

    $30

    per month

    Pricing
    Claude CodeCursor
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Team - Premium
    $30
    per month
    Team - Super
    $100
    per month
    Team - Ultimate
    $200
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Claude CodeCursor
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Cursor is now available as part of The X Subscription. A discount is available for annual billing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Claude CodeCursor
    Considered Both Products
    Anthropic
    No answer on this topic
    SpaceX
    Chose Cursor
    Cursor is fast and cheap, but for some tasks I can't rely on it; I use Claude Code for more complex tasks or to enhance the UI.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cursor
    We use both Claude Code and Cursor. However, we find Cursor to be quite fast compared to Claude Code. Claude Code seems to be able to reach higher levels of intelligence, though that's not really necessary much of the time. The speed of Cursor can really stand out in comparison.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cursor
    Cursor is superior because its integration is easy; it provides the same benefits as the others, but it does so by managing LLMs in a more intuitive way. The fact that it is now proprietary to SpaceXAI might make the use of Grok more efficient and maybe cheaper for users …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    User Ratings
    Claude CodeCursor
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.2
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.4
    (11 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Claude CodeCursor
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Anthropic
    Whenever I have a bug or something to solve from Jira, I give Claude an explanation and the Jira ticket and it ultimately solves the problem and can commit my code to github. It's a powerful tool and asks me clarifying questions when they are needed to best suit the needs of my requirements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpaceX
    Less appropriate for people who don't use LLMs to code but instead to create artifacts. Cursor is a fluid development platform, not something that will create an artifact to run in the cloud. Well designed to work on teams, to manage the code and how the LLMs interact with the code itself. Great for deep vibe coding.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Anthropic
    No answers on this topic
    SpaceX
    • API creation.
    • Integrations
    • Plan mode for large tasks.
    • Refactoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Anthropic
    No answers on this topic
    SpaceX
    • The CLI agent can be quite finicky via ACP.
    • It can be hard to understand how much different models will cost.
    • Support can be unresponsive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Anthropic
    No answers on this topic
    SpaceX
    Cursor is the best AI-powered IDE available today. The agents intelligently absorb context from the code, memory, and rules, and are capable of iterating with subagents until acceptance criteria is met.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Anthropic
    It is only keyboard accessible but very usable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpaceX
    Cursor is useful for all our developer team. Each and every team member use Cursor for coding and also Cursor has various models like composer, codex, claude and openai models which helps a lot for quality codings. Also Cursor help to create documents in md file format with markdown and preview which helps a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Anthropic
    It out shines them, Anthropic Claude is a close second since it does a very similar job. I mostly use that in Visual Studio Code. Github Copilot uses Claude but I feel like the terminal and/or Anthropic Claude is superior to this. I am a GUI guy but the terminal has features that can't be replicated anywhere else.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpaceX
    graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor is the one that has done it the best out of all of the code harnesses that we’ve tried
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Anthropic
    No answers on this topic
    SpaceX
    • Development speed increased at least 25%
    • The result of the final Product is better than before/without it
    • We use it as a standard now
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots