TrustRadius

Cursor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cursor
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Cursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.
$20
per month
Pricing
Cursor
Editions & Modules
Pro
$20
per month
Teams
$40
per month per user
Pro+
$60
per month
Ultra
$200
per month
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cursor
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery plan includes a set amount of model usage. Additional usage is based on the models and features used. The Bugbot add-on is available at $40 per month, per user, or with Custom pricing for Enterprise customers. A discount is available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cursor
Considered Both Products
Cursor
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Cursor
We use both Claude Code and Cursor. However, we find Cursor to be quite fast compared to Claude Code. Claude Code seems to be able to reach higher levels of intelligence, though that's not really necessary much of the time. The speed of Cursor can really stand out in comparison.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Cursor
Cursor is superior because its integration is easy; it provides the same benefits as the others, but it does so by managing LLMs in a more intuitive way. The fact that it is now proprietary to SpaceXAI might make the use of Grok more efficient and maybe cheaper for users …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Cursor
Cursor contains multiple AI model from different LLM Model builders, so Cursor stacks up against them with even their model also and other models also and gives a free composer model to do coding easily for the developers. Even when the token completed for the subscription …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Cursor
graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor …
GJ
Gregory Johnston Jr.
Manager, Engineering Systems
Chose Cursor
Better agentic coding quality, inherent context of code by repo caching, easier to configure guardrails - these all amount to better quality code with less iteration and fussing around with the agent to get it to do what you want.
Evelyn So, M.Sc | TrustRadius Reviewer
Evelyn So, M.Sc
Innovation UX Consultant
Chose Cursor
Softr's chat AI is less sophisticated. However, it is great for building simple database-driven webapps. I have used it together with Airtable to build a very simple webapp. It is drag and drop. Vercel V0's chatAI is faster and more friendly. The user interface is also …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Cursor
Cursor has built-in AI and is a fork based on Visual Studio Code. So the fact is, it is better than Visual Studio Code because of AI, and if you are a developer that uses more than notebooks, in my opinion, it surely beats Jupyter Notebook, too. It is my go-to for basically all …
User Ratings
Cursor
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cursor
Likelihood to Recommend
Cursor is really great when you care most about access to a variety of models. It's very high-performing for code indexing, meaning models run very fast.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • Generate code
  • Guide webapp development
  • Guide webapp deployment
Evelyn So, M.Sc | TrustRadius Reviewer
Evelyn So, M.Sc
Innovation UX Consultant
Read full review
Cons
  • The composer tool can still get more accurate
  • More LLM models
  • automate the creation of folders and files in a project
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
it is really easy to set up and to connect with GitHub or any other git manager that you have and our team really loves the fact that whenever we do work, it’s very easy to open PRS for a Sr software staff to check the PRS and just merge it
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cursor is superior because its integration is easy; it provides the same benefits as the others, but it does so by managing LLMs in a more intuitive way. The fact that it is now proprietary to SpaceXAI might make the use of Grok more efficient and maybe cheaper for users compared to Claude and Gemini.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Mostly I have positive impact on Cursor only for implementing complex features and functionalities.
  • Cursor mainly save our development time testing time more than 50%.
  • Cursor helps to improve code quality of our all project folder and files.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots