Cursor

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cursor	Score 9.5 out of 10	N/A	Cursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.	$20 per month

Pricing

Cursor

Editions & Modules

Pro: $20
per month
Teams: $40
per month per user
Pro+: $60
per month
Ultra: $200
per month
Enterprise: Custom

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cursor
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Every plan includes a set amount of model usage. Additional usage is based on the models and features used. The Bugbot add-on is available at $40 per month, per user, or with Custom pricing for Enterprise customers. A discount is available for annual billing.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cursor
Considered Both Products	Cursor AS Abhishek Sharma Sonftware Developer Chose Cursor When I used it had some bugs, that their release note mention that the lastest models are released but those were not available on the IDE. from last year I'm using the Cursor as my main IDE. Incentivized Helpful? Gregory Johnston Jr. Manager, Engineering Systems Chose Cursor Better agentic coding quality, inherent context of code by repo caching, easier to configure guardrails - these all amount to better quality code with less iteration and fussing around with the agent to get it to do what you want. Incentivized Helpful? Krisnananda Mahapatra Software Engineer Chose Cursor Cursor is fast and cheap, but for some tasks I can't rely on it; I use Claude Code for more complex tasks or to enhance the UI. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cursor We use both Claude Code and Cursor. However, we find Cursor to be quite fast compared to Claude Code. Claude Code seems to be able to reach higher levels of intelligence, though that's not really necessary much of the time. The speed of Cursor can really stand out in comparison. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User C-Level Executive Chose Cursor Cursor is superior because its integration is easy; it provides the same benefits as the others, but it does so by managing LLMs in a more intuitive way. The fact that it is now proprietary to SpaceXAI might make the use of Grok more efficient and maybe cheaper for users … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose Cursor Cursor contains multiple AI model from different LLM Model builders, so Cursor stacks up against them with even their model also and other models also and gives a free composer model to do coding easily for the developers. Even when the token completed for the subscription … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Program Manager Chose Cursor graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor … Incentivized Helpful? Evelyn So, M.Sc Innovation UX Consultant Chose Cursor Softr's chat AI is less sophisticated. However, it is great for building simple database-driven webapps. I have used it together with Airtable to build a very simple webapp. It is drag and drop. Vercel V0's chatAI is faster and more friendly. The user interface is also … Helpful? Verified User C-Level Executive Chose Cursor Cursor has built-in AI and is a fork based on Visual Studio Code. So the fact is, it is better than Visual Studio Code because of AI, and if you are a developer that uses more than notebooks, in my opinion, it surely beats Jupyter Notebook, too. It is my go-to for basically all … Incentivized Helpful?

User Ratings
	Cursor
Likelihood to Recommend	9.5 (10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	9.2 (10 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cursor
Likelihood to Recommend	SpaceX Less appropriate for people who don't use LLMs to code but instead to create artifacts. Cursor is a fluid development platform, not something that will create an artifact to run in the cloud. Well designed to work on teams, to manage the code and how the LLMs interact with the code itself. Great for deep vibe coding. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	SpaceX API creation. Integrations Plan mode for large tasks. Refactoring. Incentivized Krisnananda Mahapatra Software Engineer Read full review
Cons	SpaceX The CLI agent can be quite finicky via ACP. It can be hard to understand how much different models will cost. Support can be unresponsive. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	SpaceX Cursor is the best AI-powered IDE available today. The agents intelligently absorb context from the code, memory, and rules, and are capable of iterating with subagents until acceptance criteria is met. Incentivized Gregory Johnston Jr. Manager, Engineering Systems Read full review
Usability	SpaceX Cursor is useful for all our developer team. Each and every team member use Cursor for coding and also Cursor has various models like composer, codex, claude and openai models which helps a lot for quality codings. Also Cursor help to create documents in md file format with markdown and preview which helps a lot. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	SpaceX graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor is the one that has done it the best out of all of the code harnesses that we’ve tried Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	SpaceX Development speed increased at least 25% The result of the final Product is better than before/without it We use it as a standard now Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots