Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudTest
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Akamai now owns and supports CloudTest, a load and performance testing solution, developed by SOASTA and acquired with the company in 2017.N/A
IBM DevOps Test Performance
Score 5.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM DevOps Test Performance helps software testing teams test earlier and more frequently by shifting testing left. IBM DevOps Test Performance validates the scalability of web and server applications, identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing. Software testing teams can execute performance tests that analyze the impact of load on applications.N/A
OctoPerf
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OctoPerf is an enterprise-grade performance and load testing platform available both as SaaS and on-premise, designed for engineering teams working on modern, distributed applications. It enables teams to simulate realistic user traffic, identify performance bottlenecks, and validate application scalability through scalable load test execution. By combining advanced load modeling, deep performance analytics, and flexible deployment options, OctoPerf supports a wide…
$69
per month
Pricing
Akamai CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Basic
$149
per month
Pro
$649
per month
Free
Free
On Demand
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsBoth pay-per-test and subscriptions are available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Features
Akamai CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Akamai CloudTest
7.2
1 Ratings
17% below category average
IBM DevOps Test Performance
-
Ratings
OctoPerf
9.4
1 Ratings
10% above category average
End to end performance management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Integrated performance data8.01 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.01 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Real time monitoring6.01 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection7.01 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Akamai CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Akamai CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai CloudTestIBM DevOps Test PerformanceOctoPerf
Likelihood to Recommend
Akamai
We were designing an Airlines reservation system, where we wanted to check the maximum number if reservation our system can handle, this tool helped us to get the test results but the issue was from set up point of view, the initial set up took too much time. But we were able to achieve our Reservation system process.
Read full review
IBM
Go for IBM RPT if: 1. You're testing a Java-based Web application with HTTP protocol 2. You wanted to distribute the load across machines easily 3. Your team is in learning phase/not really introduced to a wide range of performance testing tools Do not go for IBM RPT if: 1. You wanted to test REST or any other advanced protocols 2. Your system under test demands a very high user load 3. Your application is written in .NET or any other platform except Java.
Read full review
OctoPerf
We used OctoPerf on Continuous Integrations and Continuous Deployment as part of load testing because it is very easy to load data on various frameworks and a wide range of validations can be done virtually. We can also design bespoke graphics and reports to aid in the validation of testing scenarios.
Read full review
Pros
Akamai
  • Integration Call's like REST
  • Integration Call's like SOAP
  • Performance Testing
  • Load Testing on Load Balancer
Read full review
IBM
  • Data Parameterisation/ Data Correlation is made simpler compared to its competitors
  • Distributed Load Testing is easier to set up
  • Performance metric gathering while a test is in progress
  • Th look and Feel really helps a beginner to understand and work with.
Read full review
OctoPerf
  • Infrastructure for the cloud that is automated.
  • We have the ability to build real-time reports and dashboards.
Read full review
Cons
Akamai
  • Report generation is difficult
  • Some graphs are not displaying accurate results
  • More information are missing with respect to load testing
Read full review
IBM
  • Memory utilization could have been improved.(Eats up system's RAM)! It may crash if a test is conducted with the heavy load if adequate RAM is not available in the VM/host machine.
  • Licensing could have been made simpler. IBM's licensing method is difficult to follow.
  • Support for protocols other than HTTP. Not really up to the current trend.
Read full review
OctoPerf
  • The version of the runtime needs be upgraded.
  • Additional features should be included.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Akamai
The bundle of features that other tools provide is much higher when compared to the one provided by Akamai CloudTest, this is something they need to focus on Priority. Most tools comes with default setup and ends to end testing scenario that can be covered, such as Regression testing. From Akamai CloudTest this is a missing features that can be added up soon.
Read full review
IBM
Cost/Licensing: While JMeter is an opensource testing tool from Apache, compared to IBM RPT and HP LoadRunner, RPT is much cheaper than Loadrunner. Functionality: JMeter provides basic functionalities which are adequate for performance testing, however advanced features are not available (such as load testing with GUI, reporting is very basic etc.). But when it comes to Loadrunner, it offers very broad features and supports a variety of protocols. So in this category, Loadrunner is a winner, but RPT is better than JMeter. Ease of operating: JMeter is easy compared to LoadRunner, but it has old GUI and look and feel is not that great to understand. Also, most of the things are to be done in a command line, non-GUI mode. While LoadRunner is very advanced with many options, which also confusing sometimes. But RPT, on the other hand, maintains a balance between simplicity and offering of different features. So winner: RPT.
Read full review
OctoPerf
Unravel Data is a cloud optimization tool, whereas OctoPerf can be used to easily run load test cases and scenarios, as well as develop automated cloud infrastructure to generate customized reports on the test cases run. For the greatest possible user experience, we have some additional functionality such as Jmeter and other legacy tools.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Akamai
  • System Hangs as where severe load testing is required
  • Authentication is an issue when using OAUTH
  • Scalability can be improved and also an on premise tool can be of great help
Read full review
IBM
  • Accuracy in metrics, thus improving system's performance
  • Costs less compared to competitor like HP LoadRunner
  • Helped the team of beginners learn things quickly
Read full review
OctoPerf
  • There is no need to know how to code.
  • Reports made to order.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OctoPerf Screenshots

Screenshot of the scripting studio in OctoPerf - no code neededScreenshot of the runtime part of the application. Here you can select multiple injection locations and run several scenarios in a single testScreenshot of live reporting with numerous metrics. The report is completely dynamics.