Codacy vs. GoodAccess
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codacy | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis… | $0 |
GoodAccess | Score9.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform (SASE/SSE) that empowers medium-sized enterprises to easily implement Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) in their infrastructure, regardless of its complexity or scale. By leveraging a Low-Code/No-Code approach, GoodAccess delivers a hardware-free, rapid deployment solution within hours or days, allowing companies to enhance their security without the need for in-house IT experts. The platform ensures… | $35 per month for 5 users (minimum) |
| Codacy | GoodAccess | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 100% Would buy again 26 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 26 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Codacy | GoodAccess | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zero Trust Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codacy | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Codacy | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Codacy Screenshots | GoodAccess Screenshots |
















