Codacy vs. Postman
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codacy | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis… | $0 |
Postman | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Postman, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their flagship API development and management free to small teams and independent developers. Higher tiers (Postman Pro and Postman Enterprise) support API management, as well as team collaboration, extended support and other advanced features. | $0 |
| Codacy | Postman | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | 1. Postman Free plan: Start designing, developing, and testing APIs at no cost for teams of up to three people. 2. Postman Basic plan: Collaborate with your team to design, develop, and test APIs faster; $12/month per user, billed annually 3. Postman Professional plan: Centrally manage the entire API workflow; $29/month per user, billed annually 4. Postman Enterprise plan: Securely manage, organize, and accelerate API-first development at scale; $99/month per user, billed annually | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Postman | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 97% Would buy again 29 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 29 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 30 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 20 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Codacy | Postman | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Postman | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | Amazon API Gateway Score7.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | ![]() Azure API Management Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | OCI API Management Score7.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codacy | Postman | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Usability | - | 8.6 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 7.1 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Codacy | Postman | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Codacy Screenshots | Postman Screenshots |

















