CoderPad vs. Glider.ai

- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.

Incentivized

It does well to verify the identity of the test taker and making sure that they are not utilizing other resources to cheat. In my experience, it is way too intrusive, and it appears as though someone has figured out how to utilize software to circumnavigate it. I have a ticket in, here's to hoping its fixed.

Incentivized

• Large range of supported languages
• Code runs quickly
• Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee

Incentivized

• Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
• Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
• A transparent and publicly available pricing

Incentivized

CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.

Incentivized

We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.

Incentivized

Glider.ai is the only product we reviewed

Incentivized

• 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
• Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
• The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts

Incentivized