TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cofense Intelligence vs. Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cofense Intelligence

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ACofense Intelligence delivers phishing-specific threats to help the user defend the business network. Cofense Intelligence uses proprietary techniques to analyze millions of messages daily from a wide variety of sources. Cofense automatically dissect messages to identify new and emerging phishing and malware threats.N/A

    Cybereason Defense Platform

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…N/A

    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)

    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them.N/A
    Pricing
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——Priced by company size
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Considered Multiple Products
    Cofense
    No answer on this topic
    LevelBlue
    No answer on this topic
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Cofense Intelligence and Cybereason Defense Platform and Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Feature
    Cofense Intelligence
    -
    Ratings
    Cybereason Defense Platform
    9.1
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    7.2
    6 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Management00 Ratings9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Infection Remediation00 Ratings10.02 Ratings7.26 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware Detection00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Cofense Intelligence and Cybereason Defense Platform and Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Feature
    Cofense Intelligence
    -
    Ratings
    Cybereason Defense Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    7.8
    10 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings7.79 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings7.89 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings00 Ratings7.510 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings7.510 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.210 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings00 Ratings7.99 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    7.8
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (18 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cofense IntelligenceCybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    LevelBlue
    I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Usually SOC leverages Intel from mutiple sources. The scenarios are: 1.Suitable: In large scale SOC where more than 5000 devices are being monitored and the tech stack is wide, Mandiant will play an excellent role in that scenario. 2.Not Suitable: In small scale SOCs wherein limited devices belonging to the same tech stack is being used then the analysts can rely on OSINT and it is not useful to buy the solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    LevelBlue
    • EDR
    • Forensics
    • Mitigation
    • Response
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • accelerated threat response feature, prioritizing threats according to requirement.
    • Optimization of the threat intelligence , and can be integrated with 3rd party tools.
    • Features like - Breach ,Adversary, Machine and Operational Intelligence.
    • Mandiant dynamic host and the malware views along with indicators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    LevelBlue
    • Slow support
    • Bugs on their interface
    • Log extraction
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Paywalls exist throughout the data set and can halt an investigation without the right model
    • Some data was incomplete or broken up between pay tiers
    • Navigation through the data lacked a definitive trail or breadcrumbs to retrace steps during investigations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    LevelBlue
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has a very usable platform, with well-differentiated sections for the analyst, as well as the possibility of cross-searching to obtain the desired results. All this is presented with an interface that is easy on the eye and not very messy, which increases productivity and the speed with which work is done.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    LevelBlue
    Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    LevelBlue
    • Helps on threat hunting
    • MalOps is very good
    • When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Improved incident response time
    • Specific investigations that have reduced the attack surface
    • Technical reports on threats not controlled by the bank's local team
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots

    Screenshot of Mandiant Advantage DashboardScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor DetailsScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor Graph