Cofense Intelligence vs. Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cofense Intelligence
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Cofense Intelligence delivers phishing-specific threats to help the user defend the business network. Cofense Intelligence uses proprietary techniques to analyze millions of messages daily from a wide variety of sources. Cofense automatically dissect messages to identify new and emerging phishing and malware threats.N/A
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them.N/A
SecIntel
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
SecIntel, from Juniper Networks, enables the threat-aware network with a feed of aggregated and verified security data that’s continuously collected from Juniper and multiple other sources. It delivers regularly updated, actionable intelligence to SRX Series firewalls, MX Series routers, Juniper wireless access points, and EXSeries and QFX Series switches.N/A
Pricing
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)SecIntel
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPriced by company size
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
Features
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cofense Intelligence
-
Ratings
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
7.2
6 Ratings
0% below category average
Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
-
Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Cofense Intelligence
-
Ratings
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
7.8
10 Ratings
8% above category average
Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
-
Ratings
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.79 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings8.210 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
Small Businesses
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
Score 7.9 out of 10
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
Score 7.9 out of 10
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
Score 7.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(18 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(18 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cofense IntelligenceGoogle Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence
Likelihood to Recommend
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Google
Usually SOC leverages Intel from mutiple sources. The scenarios are: 1.Suitable: In large scale SOC where more than 5000 devices are being monitored and the tech stack is wide, Mandiant will play an excellent role in that scenario. 2.Not Suitable: In small scale SOCs wherein limited devices belonging to the same tech stack is being used then the analysts can rely on OSINT and it is not useful to buy the solution.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
It is well suited in cases if you want good threat intelligence software that can collect data from multiple sources. A tool with threat logging and detection/enforcement capabilities that enable you to identify, monitor passively, and block known threats at the firewall. Although it is very costly compared to its competitors it is worth it in terms of the functionality it provides to organizations.
Read full review
Pros
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Google
  • accelerated threat response feature, prioritizing threats according to requirement.
  • Optimization of the threat intelligence , and can be integrated with 3rd party tools.
  • Features like - Breach ,Adversary, Machine and Operational Intelligence.
  • Mandiant dynamic host and the malware views along with indicators.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Feeds on malicious IP, URLs and domains.
  • Infected host and custom threat feed.
  • Allows data from third party sources.
Read full review
Cons
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Google
  • Paywalls exist throughout the data set and can halt an investigation without the right model
  • Some data was incomplete or broken up between pay tiers
  • Navigation through the data lacked a definitive trail or breadcrumbs to retrace steps during investigations
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Free trial / free version should be there.
  • Licensing cost should be less.
  • Customer support service can be improved.
Read full review
Usability
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Google
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has a very usable platform, with well-differentiated sections for the analyst, as well as the possibility of cross-searching to obtain the desired results. All this is presented with an interface that is easy on the eye and not very messy, which increases productivity and the speed with which work is done.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Google
It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current organization
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Google
  • Improved incident response time
  • Specific investigations that have reduced the attack surface
  • Technical reports on threats not controlled by the bank's local team
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Increase in compliance with regulatory requirements.
  • Increase in customers and clients trust.
  • Overall organization security posture has been improved.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots

Screenshot of Mandiant Advantage DashboardScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor DetailsScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor Graph