TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Compligo

    Score8 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Compligo is cloud-based software that aims to consolidate all compliance activities into a single system accessible from any device. The goal is to ensure timely, documented completion across the workforce, including regulatory obligations, HR policy, code of conduct, safety training, etc. According to the vendor, key capabilities include: Role-based activity assignment ensures everyone knows what compliance activities are required of them based on their job…N/A

    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an integrated suite for managing requirements, engineering work, system and software models, and verification activities across complex product-development programs. It is used by systems engineers, software teams, test organizations, project managers, and compliance teams in industries such as automotive, aerospace and defense, medical devices, and public infrastructure.N/A
    Pricing
    CompligoIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CompligoIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsCompligo is priced on a per-employee basis. Compli offers tiered implementation services depending on content, customization and third-party integration requirements.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CompligoIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Considered Both Products
    KPA, LLC
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    78%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    CompligoIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CompligoIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.0
    (22 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CompligoIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    KPA, LLC
    Compligo is well used for a larger organization that needs to track compliance and trainings. It has a vast library of trainings which you can assign and track completions across your organization. It can also help tracking current and previous pay plans for employees. Compligo would most likely not be appropriate for smaller organizations who do not need to track so many people. It may not also be as appropriate for companies located in states with less laws or compliances as far as training and record retention.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The software is robust enough to handle highly complex software development or other product development and can be used well beyond the range to do what a client needs. However, because of the inability to hold its users to proper best practices, things can get wildly out of hand and cascade over the years, creating unnecessary technical debt. The system has a lot of usable features, but they don't funnel users toward the correct processes and practices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    KPA, LLC
    • Compliance
    • Tracking Activites
    • Email Notifications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Open Services supporting Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC).
    • Required definition management and managed capabilities enabling.
    • Rational DOORS Web Access for local on the test field presence.
    • On-sites established reporting system.
    • Approved linking requirements to test plans
    • Engineering Requirements Management DOORS traces requirements thereby eliminates manually processes and spreadsheets, for improved productivity.
    • Returns the investment efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    KPA, LLC
    • Support times
    • Speed
    • Down Times
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • I feel like it is too heavy sometimes and updating is not very straight forward. For example, if I want to change an incident ticket (IN) to a service request (SR) and add some comment for the change, I have to first change the IN to SR, then click refresh which takes a few seconds, then add a comment. If I forget the refresh step, my comment will be discarded without warning like my ticket is not in the latest status. This also happens when somebody else changes the ticket during my edit as I can not lock the ticket exclusively.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    KPA, LLC
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    At the moment we are required by contract to continue to use the IBM DOORS software for our current client. Given that it can be expensive, if we were to use it after our current client's needs were met, we would have to secure other projects in order to justify the continued use of the software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    KPA, LLC
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The UI is terrible and not intuitive. Users need training in order to complete tasks. Much like SAP, it's not the clearest tool. The tracing feature is especially complicated because you must write the scripts yourself. There is a learning curve. Also, even the setup, installation, and logging in each time takes a considerable amount of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    KPA, LLC
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It does a basic job and has the potential to complete some robust reporting tasks, however, it really is a clunky piece of software with a terrible user interface that makes using it routinely quite unpleasant. Many of our legacy and maintenance projects still use DOORS but our department and company use many alternatives and are looking for better tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    KPA, LLC
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    KPA, LLC
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It was easier to do all the change management-related activities, even configurations were handled very effectively. New process definitions and initiatives made it easier for better project deliverables. Effective resource allocations and better reporting and defect management. The overall cost of the tool is great too and well within budget.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    KPA, LLC
    • It has made record retention easier
    • It has made legacy pay plans easier to find
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It's part of CLM suite so it can be used to manage the whole lifecycle with tight integration with development module (Rational Team Concert) and quality module (Rational Quality Manager).
    • Comprehensive reports and dashboards provide better visibility.
    • License cost is on higher side.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Compligo Screenshots

    Screenshot of Executive DashboardsScreenshot of Individual Compliance ScoresScreenshot of Smart Activity AssignmentScreenshot of Visual Reporting