IBM ELM Is Outdated And Other Products Are Better Equipped For Modern Workflows.
November 05, 2025
IBM ELM Is Outdated And Other Products Are Better Equipped For Modern Workflows.

Score 3 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- Workflow Management (Rational Team Concert)
- Requirements Management (Rational DOORS)
- Test Management (Rational Quality Manager)
- Lifecycle Query Engine
- Jazz Reporting Services
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
Team ticket tracking, change request tracking, defect tracking, source control management, requirements tracking, and reporting of data therein to internal and our client.
Pros
- Useful for tracking very large and very complex dev/ops.
- The API, while not well documented, can be integrated with other apps with highly customized work.
- Flexible hosting apparatus on server, both Windows and UNIX.
Cons
- Installation and upgrades are terribly complex and requires many hours of preparation.
- User management in roles and permissions is archaic and inflexible.
- Low-to-no automation out of the box, must be customized and done for each use case.
- The amount of effort needed, for years - to get it working stable processes is burdensome.
- There are other, more well-suited software to do dev/ops, even if it requires two or three together.
- ELM is a jack of all trades and a master of none in the sense that it can do quite a lot, but it's up to the team managing it to make it absolutely bulletproof to users, requiring ongoing maintenance and oversight.
Unfortunately, this IBM ELM installation predates my tenure, and the project and client have become entrenched in it with no viable way to move off of it. There are better products capable of doing individual workflows well. ELM's attraction is that it does a lot of things OK.
Do you think IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management's feature set?
No
Did IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management go as expected?
No
Would you buy IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management again?
No

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation