Compligo vs. Onspring

Compligo is well used for a larger organization that needs to track compliance and trainings. It has a vast library of trainings which you can assign and track completions across your organization. It can also help tracking current and previous pay plans for employees. Compligo would most likely not be appropriate for smaller organizations who do not need to track so many people. It may not also be as appropriate for companies located in states with less laws or compliances as far as training and record retention.

Incentivized

As an financial and consulting working professional we had many challenges related to being compliant with other financial and governmental regulations and standard. For that we need so many different process, business units and other interested parties to come on same table and work on every single control to get compliant with those regulations. In this case we have manage so many risks and work on timely remediation. Onspring worked well in this.

Incentivized

• Compliance
• Tracking Activites
• Email Notifications

Incentivized

• Findings
• Reporting
• Exceptions
• Policies
• Standard

Incentivized

• Support times
• Speed
• Down Times

Incentivized

• Integration with other tools
• Risk Register management
• Asset and Process Management

Incentivized

RSA Archer is also great tool but why I choose Onspring is because it is user friendly and easy UI on the other hand Archer is so lethal and complex system which sometimes lack behind in term performance and scalability.

Incentivized

• It has made record retention easier
• It has made legacy pay plans easier to find

Incentivized

• Positive - Risk Management
• Positive - Findings Management
• Negative - Integration issue with some of tools

Incentivized