ConstructConnect Bid Management vs. On-Screen Takeoff®

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ConstructConnect Bid Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Combining the functionality of SmartBid and iSqFt, the ConstructConnect Bid Management platform lets users send invitations to bid, prequalify subcontractors, build a network, and secure bid coverage.N/A
On-Screen Takeoff®
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
On-Screen Takeoff is a construction takeoff and estimating solution. It is intended to streamline takeoff, RFI, and bidding processes.N/A
Pricing
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAs a cloud-based solution, our clients can scale their access annually depending on the number of users. Subcontractors invited to bid or prequalify in the system receive access at no cost.On-Screen Takeoff® pricing varies based on licensing options and specific business needs. The annual subscription plans are designed to scale with project and team size. Available Subscription Options: •On-Screen Takeoff •On-Screen Takeoff with Takeoff Boost™ •On-Screen Takeoff and Quick Bid® •On-Screen Takeoff with Takeoff Boost and Quick Bid Each subscription is customized to match the subscriber's workflow requirements. A 14-day free trial is available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Considered Both Products
ConstructConnect Bid Management
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
iSqFt is a solid competitor in the bidding/estimating platform world but as a user, Building Connected is the front runner. iSqFt lacks on the collaboration side and isn't as easy to use and access as its competitors. Building Connected is used by most of our clients so it's …
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
SmartBid is the first software of its kind that I use. However, comparing it with other software used by colleagues, it is evident that SmartBid has a much higher potential than software of the same category. By allowing easier management of documents and sub-contractors, …
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
PlanHub and iSqFt are comparable to eachother. I do believe iSqFt has a slightly better user interface. I have used both for many years and do not particularly prefer one over the other. They both seem to have the same features and information that allow me to easily review and …
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
SmartBid is by far the most aesthetically pleasing of the software I've used in the field. It is incredibly competitive in terms of price and ease-of-use and is one of my favorites to use. I use SmartBid as well as other programs, but SmartBid is always one of my first choices.
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
SmartBid is used by more of the contractors that we happen to do lots of work with. It has basically the same features. However, SmartBid will let subcontractors view all the jobs a general contractor is bidding, even ones we were never invited to. So it has the potential to …
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
iSqFt is the better choice over Procore, iSqFt is a lot better than Procore all the way around even with its slow download speed.
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
I have been invited to view projects on other platforms such as Procore and have been required to enter a login for certain jobs. However, I can't find any where to register for the site. This may be something I've overlooked but the fact that I can't find it right away made …
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
I have not used another other companies similar to SmartBid
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
SmartBidNet is far superior to BidMail in my opinion. BidMail was good in that it had all of the information in one screen right in front of your eyes; however, it was very limited in managing the subcontractors and making sure that they all received the documents. It also was …
Chose ConstructConnect Bid Management
  • Better ability for subcontractors to respond via program.
  • Simpler interface.
  • Easier note tracking.
On-Screen Takeoff®
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
We've done some simple takeoffs with Bluebeam, but it is much more limited in functionality and capability than On-Screen Takeoff.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
I have only used On-Screen Takeoff. I have not had the opportunity or desire to use a different product. We also use their sister software called Quick Bid, so we are locked in with the On Center Suite.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
Being able to train individuals in a single afternoon on the program and trusting them to get you something usable as soon as possible is quite invaluable. It is also something that I feel is unique to this program. It is just easier.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
I think that the simplicity and set up of On-Screen Takeoff makes this an overall better software than Bluebeam or Navisworks. Both of which can be used to create good takeoffs but they are limited in ways that on screen is not so it is a much more versatile take off tool. I …
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
On-Screen Takeoff is a dedicated program for quantity takeoffs. While other programs have similar capabilities, On-Screen Takeoff is by far the most user-friendly and easiest to integrate with other tools. Being able to copy and paste directly into Excel is a huge boon for our …
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
On-screen Takeoff is better thanBluebeamm for the organization in my opinion.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
On-Screen Takeoff is very easy to learn and very effective at getting the quantities desired. You can set the scale, create groups, layers, typical groups and so much more. It can also be used to produce visual aids for communicating information to individuals that might not be …
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
I used OST at my previous job. Did a trial with PlanSwift prior to purchasing OST at my new job. Even though they were basically the same, I liked OST much more because I was more familiar with it.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
OST simply is a more robust product at the moment. Bluebeam is fine for a simple, quick takeoff but requires a vast amount of effort to layer, perform the calculations you need and (most importantly) secure your takeoff. Bluebeam may head for there in the future, but for right …
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
I don't compare these cause I used both software for two different operations.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
OST is still the most efficient and quick way of doing 2D takeoff. The software mentioned above all have their positives and negatives and they all have things which are far superior to OST. But OST really takes the cake when it comes to usability and a simple and useful …
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
I haven't used any other products other than conventional scaled rulers.
Chose On-Screen Takeoff®
Bluebeam has measuring / take-off capabilities, but it isn't as powerful as On-Screen. Bluebeam is a better version of Adobe that has additional features similar to On-Screen.
Features
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
ConstructConnect Bid Management
6.1
Ratings
20% below category average
On-Screen Takeoff®
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation1.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
ConstructConnect Bid Management
9.0
Ratings
17% above category average
On-Screen Takeoff®
-
Ratings
Bid creation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.4 out of 10
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConstructConnect Bid ManagementOn-Screen Takeoff®
Likelihood to Recommend
As mentioned before in some of the previous questions, the confidentiality agreement feature is extremely helpful. I have worked on several projects where it's so early in the design phase that the documents are considered confidential and we are required to get a signed NDA from every person who sees the documents. This feature makes it extremely painless. SmartBidNet is less appropriate if you're just doing a quick cost exercise where you might not need to contact several subs. It's easier to just use email and a cloud sharing program like Box or Egnyte.
Read full review
  • I would recommend On-Screen Takeoff to any contractor that is not using it for estimating purposes. It helps the process in so many ways.
  • I guess if it was something straightforward, it might not be the most cost-effective solution. For what we do, it is indispensable.
Read full review
Pros
  • Even with a "Limited Access" free account, you are able to see all the necessary files. When using it to just look at a job and download documents, this is all you should need. With more access you can see more projects that are out to bid but as a sales engineer for a manufacturer, I receive the bid requests from my contractors who are bidding there is no need to upgrade my access level.
  • Documents are very easy to download into a .zip file and you can pick and choose which documents you want to download for specific trades. Plus there is a specific tab for Addenda so you don't have to search through the Documents tab. The tabs also show the amount of files in each tab so you can easily stay up to date on current documents.
  • The Dashboard of each job shows the project general contractor and for subcontractors, responding to a bid request is as easy as clicking a button to indicate if you will bud or will not bid. This dashboard also shows location and the project description which are particularly helpful for a manufacturers rep/sales engineer that may not see the project description otherwise.
Read full review
  • User-friendly and easy to learn. You can sit down and figure out how to do simple takeoffs and counts with minimal training.
  • It is very accurate and it is great that you can do several calculations for each condition you make.
  • The colors and shapes provide a great visible audit trail.
  • The layering feature helps from keeping the screen too busy if you are doing several conditions on one page.
  • The worksheet tab keeps tallies of all the takeoffs from each page nicely.
Read full review
Cons
  • iSqFt has one major flaw that makes it a pain to use. I go there to get plans and specs. You think a company that sends you plans and specs would have a faster download speed, it takes forever to get the plans and specs. I usually find a way around iSqFt to get the plans and specs.
Read full review
  • How documents are uploaded to the program. On-Screen Takeoff will locate the files from whatever path you originally save it to. Therefore, if you move the location of the document, OST will not be able to open your project until the path is redirected.
  • Taking off curved shapes.
  • If you could apply a unit cost to a quantity, it would eliminate the need to export takeoff to Excel.
  • It would be nice to be able to apply a different scale to the same page i.e. if there are two different details on a drawing at two different scales, I have to duplicate the sheet and make sure I make each sheet scale to the specific detail on the sheet.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It provides invaluable communication, organization, and flexibility to generate a project overview both visually and by the numbers. In addition to the overview it makes getting into the project details easy and quick, so our takeoff is accurate and correct every time
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
On Screen Takeoff is a valuable tool for what it does. Across the board it can keep track of the critical data and corresponding values without extra legwork. While powerful, it is prone to user error, and the problem can compound quickly if not realized up front. Overall a great project tool, but not without limitations
Read full review
Support Rating
SmartBid has an excellent support team that is always at your service. Any problem I've had (when I've even had them) has been resolved almost immediately, along with tips on how to avoid them in the future. If you're looking for a program with excellent customer service, look no further than SmartBid.
Read full review
I have had very few issues with the software which is probably the first sign that there is a good customer support team, since I am sure they are working and fixing problems for everyone when they get a report from somewhere. The few times I have had to reach out to support they have been knowledgeable and on top of helping me quickly get my issues resolved.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation was as simple as setting up the program and creating databases. Everything else was already in use and this was a supplement to the final organization of the system
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SmartBid is the first software of its kind that I use. However, comparing it with other software used by colleagues, it is evident that SmartBid has a much higher potential than software of the same category. By allowing easier management of documents and sub-contractors, SmartBid allows a high increase in the overall speed and efficiency of the interventions in the construction sites. Furthermore, using it makes it possible to increase the number of projects we can manage simultaneously.
Read full review
OST is still the most efficient and quick way of doing 2D takeoff. The software mentioned above all have their positives and negatives and they all have things which are far superior to OST. But OST really takes the cake when it comes to usability and a simple and useful interface. It's just so easy to create a condition on the fly and start taking something off. When it comes to actual 2D takeoff, OST is by far the easiest and most efficient way of getting the work done.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has helped increase exposure and the number of General Contractors we can meet and bid with
  • It has caused some wasted time by digging through bids that do not have all the relevant information to issue a proposal
  • It has made bidding opportunities easier by sending them directly to us.
Read full review
  • The main benefit for using this software is that our estimating takeoff productivity has gone way up from where it was before allowing us to compile bids and estimates in a quicker and more accurate way.
  • The ease of use has allowed us to reduce the time and investment we have had to put into training new hires on the software.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ConstructConnect Bid Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

On-Screen Takeoff® Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of