TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CONTENTdm

    Score6.2 out of 10
    N/ACONTENTdm is a DAM for libraries, from OCLC headquartered in Dublin, Ohio.N/A

    SpiderOak One Backup

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ASpiderOak is a file sync and cloud storage / backup solution, emphasizing privacy.

    $6

    per month per user

    Pricing
    CONTENTdmSpiderOak One Backup
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    150 GB
    $6
    per month per user
    400 GB
    $11
    per month per user
    2 TB
    $14
    per month per user
    5 TB
    $29
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CONTENTdmSpiderOak One Backup
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CONTENTdmSpiderOak One Backup
    Small Businesses
    Adobe Bridge
    Score8.5 out of 10
    IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cloudinary
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Apple iCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Acquia DAM (Widen)
    Score7.9 out of 10
    ownCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CONTENTdmSpiderOak One Backup
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CONTENTdmSpiderOak One Backup
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OCLC
    CONTENTdm is well-suited for smaller organizations as a simple solution to present a digital collection on the web. If your need is complex and requires digital preservation as part of the workflow, it may not be the best solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpiderOak
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    OCLC
    • Constant URLs
    • User interface is good
    • Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpiderOak
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    OCLC
    • As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks.
    • Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities.
    • The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpiderOak
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OCLC
    We selected CONTENTdm because it had a good reputation, was used by many institutions, provided a good product, and supplied feedback and monthly reports. We are wondering about DPLA and if that will be the next evolution or platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpiderOak
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OCLC
    • It helped us to get started with our digital collections projects at a relatively low cost.
    • As our needs grew, it became apparent that we needed something more powerful, and that provides better workflows and better statistics and is able to handle the whole life cycle of digitation projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SpiderOak
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots