CONTENTdm vs. Storyblok

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CONTENTdm
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
CONTENTdm is a DAM for libraries, from OCLC headquartered in Dublin, Ohio.N/A
Storyblok
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Storyblok helps teams to tell their stories and manage their content for every use-case: corporate websites, e-commerce, helpdesks, mobile apps, and screen displays. Storyblok features: Visual Editor: Live preview changes made on a website Component approach: Nestable content bloks make content management easy. Headless / API: Access data through its APIs Boasting customers in nearly every industry and country, Storyblok states they help thousands of…
$0
Free with 1 Seat
Pricing
CONTENTdmStoryblok
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Community
$0.00
Free with 1 Seat
Entry
$99
per month Includes 5 team member seats
Business
$849
per month Includes 20 team member seats
Enterprise
$3,299
per month 30 users included
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CONTENTdmStoryblok
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
CONTENTdmStoryblok
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
CONTENTdm
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.7
2 Ratings
18% below category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings6.72 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
CONTENTdm
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.5
2 Ratings
17% below category average
API00 Ratings4.82 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
CONTENTdm
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.4
2 Ratings
17% below category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.22 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings4.32 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
CONTENTdm
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.1
2 Ratings
18% below category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings4.32 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings6.72 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CONTENTdmStoryblok
Small Businesses
Adobe Bridge
Adobe Bridge
Score 8.8 out of 10
Divi
Divi
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CONTENTdmStoryblok
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(2 ratings)
7.6
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CONTENTdmStoryblok
Likelihood to Recommend
OCLC
CONTENTdm is well-suited for smaller organizations as a simple solution to present a digital collection on the web. If your need is complex and requires digital preservation as part of the workflow, it may not be the best solution.
Read full review
Storyblok
Great content management experience offered by Storyblok and very effective tool for the Cloud data management and easy content publishing system and the project documentation toolcdsjwskasegvs also provides the best capabilities. The user can edit even images files and other fDCFDHHJFJKDGDFGFGGGGGGiles through the system and generate the best analytics for effvbfjjferjjebective production decisions making.
Read full review
Pros
OCLC
  • Constant URLs
  • User interface is good
  • Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear
Read full review
Storyblok
  • Very easy to generate project documents
  • Obtaining the best data insights across cloud services
  • Easy creating various content
Read full review
Cons
OCLC
  • As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks.
  • Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities.
  • The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics.
Read full review
Storyblok
  • When getting started with Storybsddfsddlok it may be confusing.
  • The dashboard configuration to sohmtteAfme users.
  • Big data content manipulation across the Cqaweqwqloud environment.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OCLC
We selected CONTENTdm because it had a good reputation, was used by many institutions, provided a good product, and supplied feedback and monthly reports. We are wondering about DPLA and if that will be the next evolution or platform.
Read full review
Storyblok
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OCLC
  • It helped us to get started with our digital collections projects at a relatively low cost.
  • As our needs grew, it became apparent that we needed something more powerful, and that provides better workflows and better statistics and is able to handle the whole life cycle of digitation projects.
Read full review
Storyblok
  • Clear and reliable data reports generation is very easy.
  • Data accessibility Storyblok is amazing.
  • Marketing management across different platforms
Read full review
ScreenShots

Storyblok Screenshots

Screenshot of The Storyblok DashboardScreenshot of Live Editing with StoryblokScreenshot of Rich text experience using Storyblok