CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) vs. Google Cloud Run
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | CoreOS rkt or Container Linux was a rival to Docker that was acquired by Red Hat, then given to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). The project has since been discontinued. | N/A |
Google Cloud Run | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application. | N/A |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Google Cloud Run | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 16 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Google Cloud Run | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.3 out of 10 | SUSE Rancher Score9.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.8 |
| Availability | - | 8.0 |
| Performance | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Configurability | - | 8.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 8.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.0 |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Professional Services | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



