CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | CoreOS rkt or Container Linux was a rival to Docker that was acquired by Red Hat, then given to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). The project has since been discontinued. | N/A |
IBM Cloud Code Engine | Score9.7 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload… | N/A |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Would buy again 14 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | IBM Cloud Code Engine | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 6.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Usability | - | 6.2 |
| CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots |






