Crowdbase (discontinued) vs. Capture for Jira, from SmartBear

I wouldn't suggest Crowdbasefor smaller companies, even for bigger companies a more integrated solution would be desirable. It may suit companies that want their collaboration separate from project management and CRM, but at least for our organisation it seems to make more sense to have most of our work tools in one place

Incentivized

The software works best in a collaborative environment where information needs to be conveyed quickly and effectively with visual and impromptu notes. If your group doesn't like to do things online and prefers the whiteboard for in-person meetings maybe this solution is overkill. In-person meetings happen frequently so this solution makes it easier to do things remotely.

Incentivized

• Collaboration
• Interaction with staff
• Great way to engage staff and support each other

Incentivized

• Documentation
• Directions
• Ease of use

Incentivized

• It is very limited
• Although it has an API it doesn't link to the services we use.
• It isn't customisable like podio.

Incentivized

• Licensing
• Some documentation topics
• More drawing options

Incentivized

Crowdbase's strength may lie in its ability to do just one main thing well, but for us this was a massive limitation. I know that it is not trying to be Podio and it is therefore unfair to compare the two but there are features that overlap. for us Podio was better suited.

Incentivized

Capture for Jira was just the right-sized application we needed to make our Jira implementation more productive and effective. We didn't want to migrate from Jira, so this was the right choice to build upon the infrastructure we already had. It was the best option without pouring more money into another solution.

Incentivized

• Encourages communication
• Easy to use
• Before crowdbase we never though of collaborating this way

Incentivized

• Efficient
• Bit expensive
• Flexible

Incentivized