Cube vs. SAP Profitability and Performance Management

1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.

SAP Profitability and Performance is well suited in an organization/scenario where it aims to grow their profitability and optimize their business performance. It will offer strong financial analytics that are applicable in modern organizations and it will assure improved performance and enable purposeful marketing of your goods/services at prevailing profitable rate.

Incentivized

• Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
• Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
• Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
• Bulk range selection within a workbook.

• It's reliable and executes profitability analysis using dependable models for modern organization.
• Has helped us optimize our business and grow our profitability assuring our return on investment.
• It's a world class platform and fits well in all organizations without any difficulties.

Incentivized

• Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
• The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.

• Connectivity to SAP Analytics Cloud (this is supposedly on SAP's roadmaps to deliver in 2020).
• The new tool has some bugs and quirks that need to be worked out. SAP is delivering enhancements on a regular basis.
• Reports and queries.
• Model Flow diagramming could work better and be visible for download or printing for training and MOC purposes.
• Documentation is weak, both in system help screens and user manuals need to be more detailed.

Incentivized

We did get excellent support from SAP during our implementation project. We will see about the SAP support over the long term.

Incentivized

Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.

Incentivized

• It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
• I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
• I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use

Incentivized

• Will lower IT costs by enabling business analysts to create and execute complex profitability and cost models.
• Will improve the velocity of period close and reporting cycles by executing complex allocations and calculations much more quickly than tools such as CO or COPA.
• Lowers cost by reducing requirements for ETL development and data replication.

Incentivized