Cursor vs. Google Antigravity

It is great for non-coders who have some technology knowledge and are comfortable following Cursor's instructions to build and deploy a webapp. Good prompting skills are needed. It is not for those who are not comfortable looking at raw codes. Cursor also is not very creative when it comes to user interface design.

• state-of-art IDE
• Best LLMs one click away
• Code suggestions very easy to use

Incentivized

• Very complex user interface
• As it generate codes for additional features, it sometimes affects existing funtions
• Black interface hard to read

Really easy to use; we've been replacing all other IDEs for it now. As it is a fork of Visual Studio Code, we transitioned to it in a very smooth way, and now our development process is faster than ever. It supports a bunch of languages and we don't need to have a webpage with an LLM open now because it is all with Cursor.

Incentivized

Softr's chat AI is less sophisticated. However, it is great for building simple database-driven webapps. I have used it together with Airtable to build a very simple webapp. It is drag and drop. Vercel V0's chatAI is faster and more friendly. The user interface is also more visually appealing and user friendly. It is comparable to Cursor though I have only used V0 briefly so have not gone through the learning curve.

• Development speed increased at least 25%
• The result of the final Product is better than before/without it
• We use it as a standard now

Incentivized