TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cursor

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ACursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.

    $20

    per month

    Lovable

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ALovable is an AI software engineer, which enables anyone to build for the web. Users simply chat to build websites and web apps, with no technical knowledge needed.

    $25

    per month 100 credits / month

    Pricing
    CursorLovable
    Editions & Modules
    Pro
    $20
    per month
    Teams
    $40
    per month per user
    Pro+
    $60
    per month
    Ultra
    $200
    per month
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Pro
    $25
    per month 100 credits / month
    Teams
    $30
    per month
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CursorLovable
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsEvery plan includes a set amount of model usage. Additional usage is based on the models and features used. The Bugbot add-on is available at $40 per month, per user, or with Custom pricing for Enterprise customers. A discount is available for annual billing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CursorLovable
    Considered Both Products
    SpaceX
    No answer on this topic
    Lovable
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    CursorLovable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (11 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.3
    (11 ratings)
    8.3
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CursorLovable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SpaceX
    Less appropriate for people who don't use LLMs to code but instead to create artifacts. Cursor is a fluid development platform, not something that will create an artifact to run in the cloud. Well designed to work on teams, to manage the code and how the LLMs interact with the code itself. Great for deep vibe coding.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    A few months ago, I had to build a solar time calculator app, and I didn't want to code that much, so I just gave a simple prompt to Lovable, like what I had to make, what I had to add, etc., and then it showed a really good output. I do have to give the prompt 2 or 3 times more, but on that project I don't have to write even a single line of code on my own; I really loved that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SpaceX
    • API creation.
    • Integrations
    • Plan mode for large tasks.
    • Refactoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    • Prototype Designing
    • Create Backend
    • Can update anything by providing your reference in image , text or url
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SpaceX
    • The CLI agent can be quite finicky via ACP.
    • It can be hard to understand how much different models will cost.
    • Support can be unresponsive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    • Small edits should be easier. Right now even a tiny change can use credits and affect other parts too.
    • I think it has to use less code, like sometimes there are extra codes, which are maybe useless.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SpaceX
    Cursor is the best AI-powered IDE available today. The agents intelligently absorb context from the code, memory, and rules, and are capable of iterating with subagents until acceptance criteria is met.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SpaceX
    Cursor is useful for all our developer team. Each and every team member use Cursor for coding and also Cursor has various models like composer, codex, claude and openai models which helps a lot for quality codings. Also Cursor help to create documents in md file format with markdown and preview which helps a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    because it's UI is very easy to use like any beginner can able to use it easily, ever sections are well structured and easily avaliable to use, it's not that much complex like any other developing apps/websites.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SpaceX
    graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor is the one that has done it the best out of all of the code harnesses that we’ve tried
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    I do not have any experience with tools that are similar to Lovable. My experience is mainly, with Lovable. I have used Lovable to make project swimlanes and workflow diagrams for my organization. I am giving my feedback based on my experience of using Lovable for these things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SpaceX
    • Development speed increased at least 25%
    • The result of the final Product is better than before/without it
    • We use it as a standard now
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lovable
    • suitable for small companies
    • can export the code using github
    • for specific requirement sometimes it stucks in iterative loop not easy to solve that specific task
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots