Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. GitLab

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cyberark Secrets Manager
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can…
$0
per month per user
Pricing
Cyberark Secrets ManagerGitLab
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
GitLab Essential
$0
per month per user
GitLab Premium
$29
per month per user
GitLab Ultimate
$99
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cyberark Secrets ManagerGitLab
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cyberark Secrets ManagerGitLab
Best Alternatives
Cyberark Secrets ManagerGitLab
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cyberark Secrets ManagerGitLab
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(2 ratings)
8.4
(154 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(12 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cyberark Secrets ManagerGitLab
Likelihood to Recommend
Cyberark
Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
Read full review
GitLab
GitLab is good if you work a lot with code and do complex repository actions. It gives you a very good overview of what were the states of your branches and the files in them at different stages in time. It's also way easier and more efficient to write pipelines for CI\CD. It's easier to read and it's easier to write them. It takes fewer clicks to achieve the same things with GitLab than it does for competitor products.
Read full review
Pros
Cyberark
  • Provide allow-list
  • verifying authority
  • validate access
Read full review
GitLab
  • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
  • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
  • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
  • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
Read full review
Cons
Cyberark
  • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
  • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
Read full review
GitLab
  • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
  • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
  • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features
Read full review
Usability
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I find it easy to use, I haven't had to do the integration work, so that's why it is a 9/10, cause I can't speak to how easy that part was or the initial set up, but day to day use is great!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version
Read full review
Performance
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
GitLab
GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO
Read full review
Support Rating
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
GitLab
At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cyberark
Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
Read full review
GitLab
Gitlab seems more cutting-edge than GitHub; however, its AI tools are not yet as mature as those of CoPilot. It feels like the next-generation product, so as we selected a tool for our startup, we decided to invest in the disruptor in the space. While there are fewer out-of-the-box templates for Gitlab, we have never discovered a lack of feature parity.
Read full review
Scalability
Cyberark
No answers on this topic
GitLab
I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cyberark
  • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
  • Gives security compliance to our company
  • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
Read full review
GitLab
  • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
  • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
  • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI

GitLab Screenshots

Screenshot of GitLab, a comprehensive DevSecOps platform.Screenshot of Security DashboardScreenshot of Merge Request