Cybereason Defense Platform vs. GoodAccess
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cybereason Defense Platform | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all… | N/A |
GoodAccess | Score9.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform (SASE/SSE) that empowers medium-sized enterprises to easily implement Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) in their infrastructure, regardless of its complexity or scale. By leveraging a Low-Code/No-Code approach, GoodAccess delivers a hardware-free, rapid deployment solution within hours or days, allowing companies to enhance their security without the need for in-house IT experts. The platform ensures… | $35 per month for 5 users (minimum) |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | GoodAccess | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cybereason Defense Platform | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 26 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 26 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | GoodAccess | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Identity Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zero Trust Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cybereason Defense Platform | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GoodAccess Screenshots |











