Azure DevOps Server vs. Cycloid Platform Engineering
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure DevOps Server | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
Cycloid | N/A | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Cycloid is an engineering platform designed to break down team silos, introduce DevOps best practices and support a hybrid cloud journey for enterprises. It's an internal developer platform that helps to facilitate end-to-end platform engineering adoption at scale in a clear and sustainable manner. Cycloid's Infra Import industrializes manually deployed infrastructure and creates Infra-as-code on the fly to ensure the sustainability and future-proof… | $39 per month per user |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $2,500 per year per installation | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | 3 pricing models are available: - Subscription based - Cloud consumption based - Cloud reselling based (Cycloid is free of charge) Additional monthly platform fee which includes devOps support is applied based on the size and scope of the organization. Full details on Cycloid website. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
91% Would buy again 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure DevOps Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | ![]() Azure DevOps Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 6.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Azure DevOps Server | Cycloid | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Cycloid Screenshots |









