D2iQ Mesosphere vs. GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
D2iQ Mesosphere
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere) still supports the Mesosphere solution, which is designed for operations at a very large scale. It's powered by DC/OS, a production-proven cloud native platform that runs containers and data services on the same infrastructure. D2iQ rebranded to reflect their change and broadening of focus towards Kubernetes but other services such as Cassandra, Kafka, and Spark. D2iQ also now offers IT professional services in tandem with its products.N/A
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
GoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source.N/A
Pricing
D2iQ MesosphereGoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
D2iQ MesosphereGoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSprings.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
D2iQ MesosphereGoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
D2iQ MesosphereGoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Small Businesses
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
D2iQ MesosphereGoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
D2iQ MesosphereGoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Likelihood to Recommend
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere)
Mesosphere is well suited for orchestrating workloads. It supports Docker as a container as well as support others. It is highly suitable for running resilient and auto recovering big data/application containers. Mesosphere has proven time and again to be production ready at a massive scale. It supports native single button/API call scale up and scale down and supports various deployment patterns like Blue-Green and others.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Unlike other providers, Springs doesn’t use a pre-built container solution, instead opting for their own software built from the ground up.
Read full review
Pros
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere)
  • Deploying mesosphere and friends (e.g. marathon)
  • Deploying applications (e.g. Cassandra, Jenkins, Spark) on to mesosphere
  • Providing value add components such as velocity, and marathon-lb
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Container hosting, cloud virtualization
  • Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing
  • Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control
Read full review
Cons
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere)
  • Setting up is a bit of a hassle, especially ZooKeeper state management and mesos and marathon quorum.
  • Occasionally, I observed some failures when deploying something onto Marathon. Logging or detailed error reporting can help.
  • Stale containers and inconsistent states resultant of the cluster failure are hard to solve and need a complete system restart to get it back to normal state.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Provide more options at lower costs
  • It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience;
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere)
I happen to like mesosphere because it integrates well with a Jenkins based workflow, Deis is a little more Heroku like and it's not clear how to fit that model into a continuous-integration process. Kubernetes has also been criticized for being complicated.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
Read full review
Return on Investment
D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere)
  • I see mesosphere as having a positive impact overall on the industry trending Docker and containers in general.
  • Seeing how mesosphere helps and simplifies things for the developer and ops, it is definitely a game changer.
  • Native support of on demand scaling up and down as per the need is one of the best features.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set.
  • Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots

Screenshot of Springs are reactive servers which scale automatically to the load. That's why you don't need to pay for unused capacity at all.