Dancing Numbers is a platform that aims to make importing, exporting, and deleting the data in QuickBooks account easier. Dancing Numbers also offers pro advisors who are present 365 days.
$199
per year per user
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Presto is an open source SQL query engine designed to run queries on data stored in Hadoop or in traditional databases.
Teradata supported development of Presto followed the acquisition of Hadapt and Revelytix.
N/A
Pricing
Dancing Numbers
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Editions & Modules
Importer, Exporter, and Deleter
$199
per year per user
Importer, Exporter, and Deleter
$199
per year per user
Accountant Basic
$499
per year Unlimited
Accountant Basic
$499
per year Unlimited
Accountant Pro
$899
per year Unlimited
Accountant Pro
$899
per year Unlimited
Accountant Premium
$1,999
per year Unlimited
Accountant Premium
$1,999
per year Unlimited
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dancing Numbers
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Dancing Numbers
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Dancing Numbers and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Feature
Dancing Numbers
9.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
PrestoDB (or Presto)
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Dancing Numbers and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Feature
Dancing Numbers
5.3
1 Ratings
32% below category average
PrestoDB (or Presto)
-
Ratings
Process designer
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
SOA support
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Dancing Numbers and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Dancing Numbers is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses needing an easy-to-use, cost-effective accounting solution, particularly during transitions from manual bookkeeping or other software. It’s especially useful for firms with basic accounting needs or limited expertise, offering automation for routine tasks. However, it may not be suitable for large enterprises with complex financial operations, businesses requiring advanced customization, or those in highly regulated industries. It also might fall short for companies with extensive international operations or high transaction volumes.
Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive is for reliable processing. If you have a fact-dim join, presto is great..however for fact-fact joins presto is not the solution.. Presto is a great replacement for proprietary technology like Vertica
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Linking, embedding links and adding images is easy enough.
Once you have become familiar with the interface, Presto becomes very quick & easy to use (but, you have to practice & repeat to know what you are doing - it is not as intuitive as one would hope).
Organizing & design is fairly simple with click & drag parameters.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Presto was not designed for large fact fact joins. This is by design as presto does not leverage disk and used memory for processing which in turn makes it fast.. However, this is a tradeoff..in an ideal world, people would like to use one system for all their use cases, and presto should get exhaustive by solving this problem.
Resource allocation is not similar to YARN and presto has a priority queue based query resource allocation..so a query that takes long takes longer...this might be alleviated by giving some more control back to the user to define priority/override.
UDF Support is not available in presto. You will have to write your own functions..while this is good for performance, it comes at a huge overhead of building exclusively for presto and not being interoperable with other systems like Hive, SparkSQL etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I’ve been using Dancing Numbers for a few months now, and overall, it’s been a great experience. The platform is user-friendly and intuitive, making it relatively easy to navigate even for someone with a moderate level of accounting knowledge. The automated data entry and reconciliation features are particularly helpful, saving us a significant amount of time and reducing manual errors.The integration with various accounting systems is a big plus, allowing us to seamlessly connect with our existing tools. Customer support has been responsive and helpful whenever we’ve had questions or needed assistance.However, there are a few areas where Dancing Numbers could improve. While the core functionalities are strong, some advanced features feel a bit limited compared to competitors. Additionally, the pricing structure could be more flexible to accommodate different business sizes and needs.Overall, Dancing Numbers is a solid choice for businesses looking to streamline their accounting processes with a reliable tool, though there’s room for enhancement in certain areas.
Presto is good for a templated design appeal. You cannot be too creative via this interface - but, the layout and options make the finalized visual product appealing to customers. The other design products I use are for different purposes and not really comparable to Presto.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info