Dataiku vs. TensorFlow

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dataiku
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The Dataiku platform unifies data work from analytics to Generative AI. It supports enterprise analytics with visual, cloud-based tooling for data preparation, visualization, and workflow automation.N/A
TensorFlow
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.N/A
Pricing
DataikuTensorFlow
Editions & Modules
Discover
Contact sales team
Business
Contact sales team
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DataikuTensorFlow
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DataikuTensorFlow
Considered Both Products
Dataiku
Chose Dataiku
Dataiku was selected for me, but I am happy about that. I like Dataiku for the user experience, it feels less code-y and I like to demo things to non technical stakeholders because they can still follow along. When you open some other notebooks, you can see that peoples eyes …
Chose Dataiku
Strictly for Data Science operations, Anaconda can be considered as a subset of Dataiku DSS. While Anaconda supports Python and R programming languages, Dataiku also provides this facility, but also provides GUI to creates models with just a click of a button. This provides the …
Chose Dataiku
Open source availability is a critical factor given licensing cost of other platforms and budget reasons. Secondly, the available features in the community version covers most of the use cases, thus making it comparable or even outdo commercial versions of other software. …
Chose Dataiku
Anaconda is mainly used by professional data scientists who have profound knowledge of Python coding, mainly used for building some new algorithm block or some optimization, then the module will be integrated into the Dataiku pipeline/workflow. While Dataiku can be used by …
TensorFlow
Chose TensorFlow
I prefer Pytorch overall, recent models are often only available with pytorch
PyTorch is also easier to use and it is often easier to find support for PyTorch code nowadays than TensorFlow
Also it seems like lots of Google internal resource uses Jax. I mostly uses TensorFlow to …
Chose TensorFlow
TensorFlow has better support for Java compared to PyTorch and is also very well documented.
Chose TensorFlow
Can't seem to choose any deep learning platform in the above, so I'll list it here:
1. Apache MXNet: this has been used for one of our main algorithms for search as an end-to-end pipeline. We chose this because of the Scala bindings, which makes it easier to integrate with out …
Chose TensorFlow
TensorFlow provides a wide range of algorithms with more detail and customization options compared to others. Also, the library is advanced and updates regularly for optimization and new functions.
Chose TensorFlow
Most of the machine learning platforms these days support integration with R and Python libraries. So, the use of reusable libraries is not an issue. TensorFlow performs well in cloud hosting and support for GPU/TPU. However, where it lacks compared to Azure is a graphical …
Chose TensorFlow
Thought about alternatives like scikit-learn, xgboost, pytorch, caffe2, fastai exist, but they don't offer as many tools and functionality as TensorFlow does. It is better to inanest in a eco-system which is very active and well maintained by giants. Being open source, one can …
Chose TensorFlow
Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, …
Chose TensorFlow

Theano is a Python library and is good for making algorithms from scratch. It is an alternative to Tensor flow. We used tensor flow because it is open source Java source and easy to learn and use.

TensorFlow is developed and maintained by Google. It's the engine behind a lot of …

Chose TensorFlow
There are lots of competitors with this library, but I think TensorFlow is the best thing for deep learning. Although it has a sharp learning curve, it's worth learning. It easy to deploy its model on Android. Keras is very good option too it, easy. In Keras, writing the neural …
Chose TensorFlow
I have used keras and matlab along with this. Also used Caffe and pyTorch sometimes, but all of them are not as powerful as TensorFlow. Keras is in good competition with TensorFlow but Keras won't allow you a lot of customization in your algorithms. And TensorFlow gives you the …
Chose TensorFlow
One major advantage of TensorFlow over Keras and other deep learning libraries is that it is the most powerful. It gives you power to write your own full customised algorithm that is not available in Keras. And it is fast too as compared to another tool as it can perform better …
Chose TensorFlow
I have used Theano to develop machine learning models, like writing the neural network. TensorFlow has reinforcement learning support and lot more algorithms while Theano does come with lots of prebuilt tools. TensorFlow provides data visualisation tools and it is possible to …
Features
DataikuTensorFlow
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
8.6
Ratings
3% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Visualization10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
8.5
Ratings
1% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DataikuTensorFlow
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DataikuTensorFlow
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DataikuTensorFlow
Likelihood to Recommend
Dataiku DSS is very well suited to handle large datasets and projects which requires a huge team to deliver results. This allows users to collaborate with each other while working on individual tasks. The workflow is easily streamlined and every action is backed up, allowing users to revert to specific tasks whenever required. While Dataiku DSS works seamlessly with all types of projects dealing with structured datasets, I haven't come across projects using Dataiku dealing with images/audio signals. But a workaround would be to store the images as vectors and perform the necessary tasks.
Read full review
  1. Whenever the problem has the demand for a neural networks based solution, Tensorflow (TF) is a great fit.
  2. The tf.dataset API makes it really simple to create complex data pipelines in a few lines of code.
  3. tf.estimators API abstracts all the complex computation graph creation logic making it very simple to get started.
  4. Eager execution makes it simple to develop a TF graph as debugging the code would be like any other imperative Python program.
  5. TF abstracts all the complexities of scaling it to multiple machines. It has various code and data distribution algorithms ready to use.
  6. Projects like TensorBoard make monitoring the training process really easy. It also gives the ability to view embeddings without any extra code. Their What-If is extremely useful for poking and understanding a black box model. It also has tools to visualize data to quickly check for anomalies.
  7. TF Autograph aims to covert any normal Python code into a distributed program which is quite handy to scale an existing code base.
Read full review
Pros
  • Low-code platform.
  • Open source version includes most valuable modules.
  • User friendly documentation.
Read full review
  • Data pipeline implementation is quite good, loading large amounts of data and pre-process it in an efficient way is no more issue for us
  • It supports all major DL algorithms and network layouts such as ConvNets, RNN, LSTMs, Word2Vec, and even the latest transformer architecture
  • The abstraction for the device is perfectly done and its support seamlessly for multiple GPU and even TPU will bring a lot of performance gain for enterprise scoped solution while still keep the flexibility
  • The TensorBoard is amazing. I haven't seen a similar thing in other frameworks on the market. It allows us to quickly understand and debug the model with the info visualization which makes understanding much better
  • A very supportive community, which is the key for sharing the ideas and find the quick and best solutions
Read full review
Cons
  • The visualization feature of flow still has a lot room to improve, when the flow is complex.
  • The "non-coding" template/building block for deep learning lack of many important configurable parameters.
  • Lack of the unified way to allow applying the "design pattern" on the Python codes (if we want to develop our own module or building blocks.
Read full review
  • It would be much better if they could provide good documentation and easy ways to understand concepts.
  • It is difficult to understand the concept behind for example, Tensor Graph, which takes a lot of time.
  • As you have to write everything, it is time consuming to write the implementation of whole neural network. It would be better if they can provide some wrapper library to make things easier.
Read full review
Usability
The user experience is very good. Everything feels intuitive and "flows" (sorry excuse the pun) so nicely, and the customization level is also appropriate to the tool. Even as a newer data scientist, it felt easy to use and the explanations/tutorials were very good. The documentation is also at a good level
Read full review
Support of multiple components and ease of development.
Read full review
Support Rating
The amazing part of Dataiku DSS is their customer service. Based on urgency and technical level, you get a reply from the Dataiku engineer when you raise a query. So far, my queries have been pretty complex to solve, so I have received solutions even from the CTO of the company as well, which is why I would describe their customer support as very good.
Read full review
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dataiku was selected for me, but I am happy about that. I like Dataiku for the user experience, it feels less code-y and I like to demo things to non technical stakeholders because they can still follow along. When you open some other notebooks, you can see that peoples eyes start to glaze over
Read full review
Can't seem to choose any deep learning platform in the above, so I'll list it here: 1. Apache MXNet: this has been used for one of our main algorithms for search as an end-to-end pipeline. We chose this because of the Scala bindings, which makes it easier to integrate with out JVM backend. MXNet seems comparable to TensorFlow, although community support is not as good as TensorFlow, and there are issues with memory leaks that are being worked on. TensorFlow in general is easier to use, but MXNet isn't too far behind. 2. Keras: still a favorite. Often I use this when paired with TensorFlow. TensorFlow 2.0 will make it even easier. 3. PyTorch: only used it a little, so it's hard to provide a good opinion. 4. DL4J: used it initially in an early days project because it has good JVM support. Harder to used not because of poor API design, but because community support is lacking and features don't come out as fast as TensorFlow.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • So far it has had a positive impact. Multiple departments are coming to us with their business problems.
  • I can't specifically say about ROI as I'm a developer, though I have heard this solution is economical compared to other AI/ML enterprise tools.
  • By using this tool, my client has let go of software that was used earlier, and we have created a simpler framework to replace that software.
Read full review
  • Positive Impact- As I mentioned before its open source. Very easy to learn for average programmer/ developer. We were able to design a POC model for understanding the patient appointment cancellation snd reasons behind it in 3 week time frame.
  • Negative Impact- If you are using tensor flow for small project it works fine. If you are trying to build a model for face recognition it will be hard to program and train the system. It needs data to be processed before hand cannot learn on the go.
Read full review
ScreenShots