DELMIAWorks (formerly EnterpriseIQ) is an industry specific ERP from IQMS, now a Dassault Systemes brand, developed for manufacturers in the aerospace, assembly, automotive, food, general manufacturing, medical devices, plastics, rubber, metal fabrication, packaging, stamping, and similar industries.
N/A
Epicor CMS
Score7.1 out of 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pricing
DELMIAWorks
Epicor CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DELMIAWorks
Epicor CMS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
DELMIAWorks
Epicor CMS
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
2.2
3 Ratings
109% below category average
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
29% above category average
Pay calculation
3.03 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
3.03 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.03 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
7.0
2 Ratings
7% below category average
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
18% above category average
API for custom integration
7.02 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
10.0
7 Ratings
17% above category average
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability
10.06 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.07 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
7.3
6 Ratings
3% below category average
Epicor CMS
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Dashboards
9.04 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Standard reports
5.06 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Custom reports
8.06 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
8.2
6 Ratings
6% above category average
Epicor CMS
9.5
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Accounts payable
8.06 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.06 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
8.5
8 Ratings
6% above category average
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
23% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.08 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.04 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Location management
10.06 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
7.3
7 Ratings
8% below category average
Epicor CMS
8.4
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Pricing
5.05 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Order entry
9.07 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.06 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
7.4
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
34% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
8.8
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
7.3
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Control Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
8.8
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
Feature
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
31% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of DELMIAWorks and Epicor CMS
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Through daily use of Epicor, it is apparent that at it's basest level, it favors a stock-based manufacturing model (your company has established SKUs and Production works to replenish stock levels when a KANBAN or other system triggers a re-order point). While it excels at that, ours is a custom-order industrial manufacturing model (we produce to customer specification or repeat orders), meaning there is no stocking of finished components, only the materials it takes to make them. It's taken some finesse (and the purchase of additional modules) to get to where we need to be.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Accounting reports: accrued receipts reporting makes it difficult to reconcile.
Fixed assets: depreciation posts to the general ledger at the asset level, generating inordinately large numbers of relatively meaningless transactions.
Process cost: PIT display lacks many useful fields, including vendor name and number.
Financial reports carry beyond two decimal places.
Report structures are not sensibly arranged, and many reports imbed data within text fields, making manipulation and reporting more time-consuming.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The menu system is easy to navigate and intuitive for users. The learning curve for administrators is quite steep form setting up user permissions to creating reports for users. This is a very powerful system with many dynamics to help most companies. Expandability is always there and it comes down to how granular you would like your company to be on a data gathering/reporting and material flow process.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is nice that an IQMS employee helps you with the implementation, however they were more of a technical resource than a project management resource. I wish they could provide a more off the shelf timeline given their experience in implementing the system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
This is the only software that I have used so I am unable to rate it based on another type of software. My experience with IQ is extensive though, and have worked and learned in all areas and love how this program works. The many different modules are relatively easy to learn and they offer support if you need additional instruction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Epicor CMS had a UI that was deemed more aesthetically pleasing than (subjective, naturally!) Sage, for which we attended a presentation/orientation session. Our Team felt Epicor (once outfitted with the necessary add-ons) would be better suited in the long run for longevity and ongoing support (especially considering our outgoing software was Sage).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our implementation of warehouse management was probably the best investment our company has made recently. The control gained over our inventory is a tremendous asset and allows to see in an instant whether or not we can meet our customers' demands.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Epicor has necessitated dedicated "Staging" personnel, as multi-line orders are generated as individual orders to Production/Manufacturing, meaning someone must ensure they all come together upon completion prior to shipping.
Payroll and Accounts Payable/Receivable have noted improved integration and tracking compared to the legacy/outgoing software (Business Vision).
Inventory tracking is vastly improved over the outgoing software, with detailed reports/tracking of remnant/off-cut materials, which benefits Material Handlers as well as the Purchasing Manager for keeping the inventory budget in line with targets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info