Descript vs. Trint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Descript
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Descript is a collaborative audio/video editor, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, that works like a doc. It includes transcription, a screen recorder, publishing, full multitrack editing, and AI tools.
$12
per month
Trint
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Trint uses artificial intelligence to power its web-based automated transcription platform. Audio and video files are uploaded to Trint’s online software and then transcribed using automated speech recognition. The Trint Editor is the marriage of a text editor to an audio/video player: the transcribed text is “stitched” to the audio or video file, making it simple to search, verify and edit the machine-generated transcripts. Users can instantly time the length of their soundbites. They can…
$80
per month per seat
Pricing
DescriptTrint
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Annual billing - Hobbyist
$12
per month per user
Monthly Billing - Hobbyist
$19
per month per user
Annual billing - Creator
$24
per month per user
Monthly Billing - Creator
$35
per month per user
Annual billing - Business
$40
per month per user
Monthly Billing - Business
$50
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom
Starter
$80
per month per seat
Advanced
$100
per month per seat
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DescriptTrint
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$15 hour
Additional DetailsUp to a 40% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DescriptTrint
Best Alternatives
DescriptTrint
Small Businesses
Ableton Live
Ableton Live
Score 8.6 out of 10
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Adobe Audition
Adobe Audition
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dovetail
Dovetail
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Adobe Audition
Adobe Audition
Score 9.0 out of 10
Verint Speech and Text Analytics
Verint Speech and Text Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DescriptTrint
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(14 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DescriptTrint
Likelihood to Recommend
Descript
Descript is well-suited for fast editing of training videos, tutorials, podcasts, and screen recordings, where transcript-based editing and quick cleanup save time. It works best when you need a simple workflow to record, transcribe, remove filler words, tighten sections, and apply basic enhancement tools like noise cleanup.
It is less appropriate for high-stakes projects where losing edits would be very costly, or when you need strong guarantees around long-term project history, backups, and recovery. Based on our experience, if you are doing many hours of edits and expect to revisit projects months later, you may want an additional export/archive process outside the platform.
Read full review
Trint
It consequently translates sound from all record designs and produces a shareable and editable transcript. The interface of Trint is decent and works really hard in interpreting the content. It can also be used when taking an interview of an individual from a different language background. Here and there the record of certain dialects contains botches which are then rectified by the actual persons.
Read full review
Pros
Descript
  • Removing filler words is a click of button and get rid of 'ums' and 'a's"
  • Fine tune your edited script in a timeline to adjust timing
  • Import and export Final Cut Pro or Premier XML video speeding up the editing process
Read full review
Trint
  • User friendly interface
  • Value for money
  • Seamless to transcribe from audio
  • Performance is quick give results fast
Read full review
Cons
Descript
  • UX Performance. Because it's synced to the cloud, there can be some delay or lag in the UX when editing.
  • Editing Transcriptions. Machine-based transcriptions always need some post-editing. While Descript makes it pretty easy, I still think there is some room for improvement. For instance, I would like to be able to automatically update for all occurrences of a word after fixing it in the transcript.
  • Automatic importing of YouTube and hosted video files. I often have to download a video from YouTube to be able to import it into Descript. Would be nice to be able to just paste in the URL to the video and have Descript automatically import it.
Read full review
Trint
  • No choice for erasing the records whenever you have utilized them.
  • The API likewise needs a great deal of work to be finished.
  • The limitless provisions are extremely less.
Read full review
Usability
Descript
It's pretty user friendly, has a easy-moderate learning curve. However during updates they do change the features in different panes / sections that make them harder to find. The text editor is near perfect, some of the other tools such as colour, templates, audio etc. are arranged in a slighlty less intuitive manner
Read full review
Trint
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Descript
We had a very frustrating experience with Descript and their support.

We used Descript to record and edit several videos. The edits were done around May, mainly using the web app. When we opened those same projects in December, many of them looked like raw recordings again. Cuts were missing and effects were missing.

Support and engineering told us they checked their logs and only saw “creation → recording → transcription,” and they said they could not find proof the edits were ever made. That explanation does not match what we saw in the app. The affected videos show two project backup files. In Descript, backups only appear after you start editing (the app even says so). But when we checked other projects that we know are raw, those do not show any backup files. We asked a simple question: if backups appear only after editing, why do the “raw” affected videos have two backups while truly raw videos have none? They did not answer this clearly.

One rep also said they noticed a spike in network errors in May. That is exactly when the edits were done, which makes it very likely the edits did not save or sync correctly. Instead of admitting this could be the cause, support kept pointing to “no logs of edits” and that it was our fault.

They refunded one month, but called it a “courtesy.” That was disappointing. We also stopped using Descript while they were investigating because we did not feel it was safe to keep working in the platform. If that one-month refund was meant to cover the time we could not use the service during the investigation, that still does not address the real damage. We lost many hours of work, we paid our editor hourly, and we paid for the subscription for convenience and reliability. For the amount of inconvenience and loss we experienced, one month is clearly not enough.
Read full review
Trint
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Descript
Descript is by far superior to the other editing software you can get on Apple computers. It's able to do a lot more and really save us tons of time. Other Adobe apps are great, but take a while to learn. Descript is very user-friendly, making it easy to start from day one with very little training.
Read full review
Trint
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Descript
  • I can get video completed much more quickly and cheaply
  • We can produce more video content because of the speed with which we can have a finished product
  • We can have shorter timelines for example I record on Monday and we publish on Tuesday which wouldn't be otherwise possible with other methods I've used
Read full review
Trint
  • Save time and money
  • Quick results help us to focus on different work
Read full review
ScreenShots

Trint Screenshots

Screenshot of