Dow Jones Risk & Compliance vs. Tracxn

It is particularly well-suited for financial institutions and other organizations in heavily regulated industries, such as banks and money service businesses that need to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) regulations, as well as organizations with a high volume of transactions. The product offers features such as watchlist screening, real-time monitoring, intelligence and research, automated workflows, reporting and visualization and easy integration with other systems. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller organizations with a lower risk profile or limited budget, or organizations with relatively simple compliance requirements

Incentivized

Well suited: - Good for scouting targets for clients, based on their industry preferences, maturity level, and investor profile preference - Helped in buy-side due diligence. Less appropriate - Lacking in terms of readily available insights, with sector reports published in-house being extremely shallow and hence not much of value addition.

Incentivized

• Data management
• User friendly
• User centric

Incentivized

• Sector reports could be better e.g. competitors like CB Insights do a better job at it.
• Pricing is a bit steep, when compared to peers like Dealroom.
• Credibility of the data is a question mark (CB Insights has way more traction with investors).

Incentivized

This beats all of the other programs. I have used all of them and Tracxn makes using the software so much easier. Using it daily I found out that it has an easy learning curve and a user-friendly interface. Data is more organized in this program as well.

Incentivized

• Positive: Reduced time to source information.
• Positive: Helped in sharper insights, leading to better outcomes on scouting engagements.
• Negative: Pricing is on the higher side.

Incentivized