Eagle Technology ProTeus vs. IFS Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Eagle Technology ProTeus
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
ProTeus from Eagle Technology in Mequon, Wisconsin is a CMMS platform.N/A
IFS Applications
Score 5.9 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Pricing
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
151% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
151% below category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.5
2 Ratings
39% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.3
2 Ratings
137% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings2.02 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.4
2 Ratings
17% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.3
2 Ratings
59% below category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
154% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Billing Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
149% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.2
1 Ratings
141% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
147% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
31% below category average
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Production Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Eagle Technology ProTeus
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Score 8.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Score 8.3 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
2.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Eagle Technology ProTeusIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
Eagle Technology
Among circuit design and printed circuit programs, it is ahead of other programs thanks to its accessibility and ease of use. Its most important feature is that it supports both the circuit design and the printed circuit program in harmony. This feature is not available in all programs. For educational purposes, students should be allowed to use it for a period of time. Especially if you do not have a license in program design devs with processors, you cannot try programs with more than 2KB.
Read full review
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Pros
Eagle Technology
  • Thanks to the library support of processors, especially PIC microcontrollers, it becomes possible to verify the code you have written by uploading the HEX code before it goes into real production.
  • It is quite easy to find and access many educational materials to learn the program.
  • From the simplest circuit to the most complex circuit, it is quite easy to design and follow.
Read full review
IFS
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
Cons
Eagle Technology
  • Path deficiencies need to be considered when transitioning the program from ISIS circuit design to ARES printed circuit drawing.
  • Especially if you are working on a processor design in ISIS, the external oscillator circuit does not pass when you transfer it to ARES.
  • In LCD and motor applications, the circuit sometimes does not work.
  • It changes according to the years in its own versions and old files are not opened in new versions.
Read full review
IFS
  • The speed of bug fixes should be improved by the IFS after sales teams. We saw the difference of responsiveness prior to Go Live and after Go Live, with a change of teams. IFS France is working on that point, and strategically wants to innovate by acting now with two other third-party companies in early 2017, to improve the after sales experience for customers.
  • There is no license model between the full licenses, which gives access to all IFS features, and the light licenses, to get access to a specific module like expense sheet. As a consequence, you must acquire a full access license for one team working only with a dedicated module (e.g. general ledger). Maybe an intermediate type license would be welcome to balance the budget. IFS tries to make prices competitive but you have to consider full upgrades of the product too, where requiring full licenses can be hard on the budget.
  • When you have an Active Directory ecosystem with a trust relationship, users from domain B can't natively access IFS, even if AD sync is in place with domain A. It's important to improve that functionality because many companies have a merge and acquisition context, with SOX constraints sometimes, and avoiding maintaining contacts or local accounts simplifies SOX compliance, or to management of accounts within the company.
Read full review
Usability
Eagle Technology
No answers on this topic
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Support Rating
Eagle Technology
No answers on this topic
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Eagle Technology
Eagle Technology ProTeus is quick and easy to use compared to other programs. There are many materials available (books, articles, videos) especially to learn how to use it. The interface of the program is quite plain and simple compared to other programs.
Read full review
IFS
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eagle Technology
  • Saving time and money by easily testing the circuits on the computer before physically installing them on the board.
  • Easy transition from circuit design to printed circuit.
  • Quick code testing in applications with CPU circuits.
  • In the trial version, transferring a maximum of 2KB of data to the processors is considered negative.
Read full review
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of