Eclipse Temurin vs. Oracle Java SE

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Eclipse Temurin
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Eclipse Temurin is the name of the OpenJDK distribution from Adoptium, a project that provides code and processes that support the building of runtime binaries and associated technologies that are high performance, enterprise-caliber, cross-platform, open-source licensed, and Java SE TCK-tested for general use across the Java ecosystem.
$0
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Java SE is a programming language and gives customers enterprise features that minimize the costs of deployment and maintenance of their Java-based IT environment.N/A
Pricing
Eclipse TemurinOracle Java SE
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Eclipse TemurinOracle Java SE
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Eclipse TemurinOracle Java SE
Considered Both Products
Eclipse Temurin
Chose Eclipse Temurin
I have used Eclipse Temurin because it has broad architecture and platform level support with reliable track record. It wins the race over other solutions.
Oracle Java SE

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Eclipse TemurinOracle Java SE
Small Businesses
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.5 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.5 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Eclipse TemurinOracle Java SE
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(32 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(19 ratings)
User Testimonials
Eclipse TemurinOracle Java SE
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
It touches almost all aspects of Java Echo system. Performance has improved drastically since 2012 release
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Java SE is well suited to long-running applications (e.g. servers). Java Swing (UI toolkit) is now rather outdated, lacking support for modern UI features. JavaFX, the potential replacement for Swing, has now been separated out of Java core. Ideally, there would be a path to migrate a large application incrementally from Swing to JavaFX, but due to different threading models and other aspects, it is difficult. At this point, it is probably better to use an embedded web browser (e.g. JxBrowser) to provide a modern UI in HTML/Javascript and keep just the business logic in Java.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Good Customer Support
  • Detailed root cause analysis of issues
  • Easy Integration with cross platform products
Read full review
Oracle
  • Plenty support built into the tool and IDE like Maven, Ant, Eclipse, IntelliJ.
  • Strong object-orientation language and clear project structure.
  • Wrapper underlines hardware and memory management so the developers can focus on business and implementation.
  • It offers a huge library and framework support from third-parties and the community.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Pricing model can be improved
Read full review
Oracle
  • Commercial Licensing in 2019. Oracle will charge commercial organizations using Java SE for upgrading to the latest bug fixes and updates. Organizations will now need to either limit their implementation of Java SE or may need to drop it altogether.
  • Slow Performance. Due to the all of the abstraction of the JVM, Java SE programs take much more resources to compile and run compared to Python.
  • Poor UI appearance on all of the major GUI libraries (Swing, SWT, etc.). Through Android Studio, it is easy to get a native look/feel for Java apps, but when it comes to desktops, the UI is far from acceptable (does not mimic the native OS's look/feel at all).
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The language is fluent and has good support from a number of open source and commercial IDEs. Language features are added every 6 months, although long-term service releases are only available every 3 years. It would be nice if some of the older APIs were depreciated with more pressure to move to the new replacement APIs (e.g. File vs. Path), but transitions to new features are generally well implemented.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Java is such a mature product at this point that there is little support from the vendor that is needed. Various sources on the internet, and especially StackOverflow, provide a wealth of knowledge and advice. Areas that may benefit from support is when dealing with complex multithreading issues and security libraries.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
I have used Eclipse Temurin because it has broad architecture and platform level support with reliable track record. It wins the race over other solutions.
Read full review
Oracle
Chose to go with Java instead of Python or C++ due to the expertise on the ground with the technology, for its ease of integration with our heterogeneous setup of production servers, and for the third party library support which we've found was able to address some challenging aspects of our business problem.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Cost Saving
  • Improved Performance
Read full review
Oracle
  • The different versions make it harder to work with other companies where some use newer versions while some use older versions, costing time to make them compatible.
  • Licenses are getting to be costly, forcing us to consider OpenJDK as an alternative.
  • New features take time to learn. When someone starts using them, everyone has to take time to learn.
Read full review
ScreenShots