EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The EDB Postgres Advanced Server is an advanced deployment of the PostgreSQL relational database with greater features and Oracle compatibility, from EnterpriseDB headquartered in Bedford, Massachusetts.N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
Pricing
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Features
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Data model creation00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
dbt
dbt
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Likelihood to Recommend
EnterpriseDB
It's great if you are using or wish to use PostgreSQL and need the added performance optimization, security features and developer and DBA tools. If you need compatibility with Oracle it's a must-have. There are many developer features that greatly assist dev teams in integrating and implementing complex middleware. It's great for optimizing complex database queries as well as for scaling. I would recommend Postgres Plus Advanced Server for any software development team that is hitting the limit of what PostgreSQL is capable of and wants to improve performance, security, and gain extra developer tools.
Read full review
IBM
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
Read full review
Pros
EnterpriseDB
  • PPAS Oracle compatibility, especially the PL/SQL syntax, has made migrating database-tier code very simple. Most Oracle packages do not need to be changed at all and those that do are generally for simple reasons like a reserved word in PPAS that is allowed in Oracle.
  • PPAS xDB, the multi-master replication tool, is simple and - most important - does not break with network or other interruptions. We have been able to configure and forget, which our customers could never do with other multi-master tools.
  • Most people had no idea that PPAS and PostgreSQL have full CRUD support for JSON. They think you need a specialized product and/or that JSON is read-only. Every organization that I have worked with is evaluating adding JSON to their relational model.
Read full review
IBM
  • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
  • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
  • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
Read full review
Cons
EnterpriseDB
  • Documentation is excellent but spread out across many resources and can take a while to wade through—would benefit from having more intro level, getting started guides for various languages.
  • Ruby support is excellent but more Ruby examples and beginner-level documentation would be nice.
  • It is sometimes hard to find a community of users on StackOverflow so a larger community, and a dedicated forum with active members to answer questions and work through issues would be nice.
Read full review
IBM
  • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
  • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
  • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
EnterpriseDB
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Scale of implementation
  • IBM techsupport
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
EnterpriseDB
PPAS proved better for our customer's data-centric apps than Oracle in all but a few edge cases (encryption at rest and multi-TB database-tier backups) because it is simpler to install/maintain, runs nearly all Oracle-syntax SQL as well as ANSI SQL. PPAS has much more JSON capabilities (full CRUD vs. read-only in Oracle), simpler geospatial, simpler / more stable replication and datatypes that match developer expectations, such as BOOLEAN and ENUMs.
Read full review
IBM
DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
Read full review
Return on Investment
EnterpriseDB
  • Postgres Plus Advanced Server is quite complex and may take longer to implement certain things than simply using PostgreSQL depending on developer familiarity with the platform.
  • Getting up to speed can be daunting so again, there is an upfront cost in time spent learning the platform, besides the potential for extra time spent on a feature-by-feature basis.
  • The cost of Postgres Plus Advanced Server should be weighed against simply using PostgreSQL to decide which is the best solution for your business needs.
Read full review
IBM
  • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
  • Better documentation and governance.
  • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
Read full review
ScreenShots