Elastic Email vs. WhoisXML Email Verification API

Email Elastic is best suited in cases when we need to send bulk emails and campaigns. It provides features such as scheduling campaigns and automating fast delivery of emails; the trial version also provides many features that can be used by a new user. Email Elastic is less suited for small companies with a smaller number of clients or contacts.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

We use WhoisXML Email Verification API for the additional value it provides to our corporate email security, and we recommend that most organizations do the same. Disposable email services may help protect the privacy of their users, but in the corporate setting, receiving emails from these domains may not be safe. So, aside from flagging emails from domains categorized as spam, we wanted our spam filtering system to be stricter and include disposable email addresses.

• High Deliverability Rate Across Most Email Providers
• Generous Free Plan for Those Just Getting Started
• Fair, Competitive Pricing & Plans/Limits

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• WhoisXML Email Verification API obtains its disposable email detection capabilities from a disposable email domain database that monitors most disposable email providers regularly.
• WhoisXML Email Verification API is compatible with most spam filtering solutions and other email security systems. It is also available as a Splunk application, so compatibility wasn’t an issue for us.

• I wish they didn't have such a strict requirement regarding their "opt out" links in emails. I totally understand why they do this, but there are use cases, such as one to one personal emails between individuals, where this is annoying. However, it's something I'm willing to live with for the greater good.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• We had to avail ourselves of the custom plan because we have a pretty large user base, and each user receives hundreds of emails per day. We were able to come up with a reasonable agreement, in any case.

I have not had any issues with Elastic Email that have required reaching out to support, so I can't speak to the quality of their customer support. The help documents were well written and presented, though, and I would imagine that anyone with issues would receive satisfactory assistance in a timely manner.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

Prompt and professional support.

Email elastic is a cost-effective, fast, and reliable platform for sending bulk emails and promoting campaigns, it provides good features even for the new user, while Blaze Verify pricing is a bit high, and a new user would not be able to access all the features. Hence clearly, Elastic email leads the position when compared to Blaze Verify.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• With a very modest outlay, we achieve features and functions that cost larger companies a lot of money.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info