Elastic Email is an email delivery service for transactional emailing.
$29
per month for up to 2,500 contacts and 37,500 emails
Zoho Zeptomail
Score9 out of 10
N/A
ZeptoMail is a transactional email sending service. Transactional emails acknowledge a transaction between a business and its customers. For example, OTP emails, order confirmation emails, password reset emails etc. With an undivided focus on sending transactional email, ZeptoMail is designed to maintain a strong sender reputation, which ensures high deliverability and good inbox placement for transactional emails. Applications and sites can be configured with ZeptoMail using…
$2.50
per credit (10,000 emails)
Pricing
Elastic Email
Zoho Zeptomail
Editions & Modules
Inbox Plus
$9
per month per user
Email API Starter
$19
per month for up to 50,000 emails
Email Marketing Starter
$29
per month for up to 2,500 contacts and 37,500 emails
Email API Pro
$49
per month for up to 50,000 emails
Email Marketing Pro
$49
per month for up to 2,500 contacts and 37,500 emails
Email Elastic is best suited in cases when we need to send bulk emails and campaigns. It provides features such as scheduling campaigns and automating fast delivery of emails; the trial version also provides many features that can be used by a new user. Email Elastic is less suited for small companies with a smaller number of clients or contacts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Its a goto product for transactional emails. Developer friendly and you have control over showing message content to suprressing email deliveries. You can configure multiple domains and create multiple accounts to keep account of usage if you need to. Less appropriate scenarios? I cant think of any use cases. One concern is on the max file size, which is about 15 MB. If you intent to send emails with larger attachments, this may not be the right product for you
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I wish they didn't have such a strict requirement regarding their "opt out" links in emails. I totally understand why they do this, but there are use cases, such as one to one personal emails between individuals, where this is annoying. However, it's something I'm willing to live with for the greater good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Code snippets are shown even after years of integration is success and working fine. This can be avoided. Being stable product, none of the dev team logs in now.
There is scope to make templates better than how they are now.
some features like auto-suppression can be shifted to agent/sub-account level. Presently they apply for all emails from all accounts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A good product. I cant rate very good as portal looks like built for developer. Once product is setup and in use, developers wont login, as said code snippeet isnt required. I dont have an option to hide this. I recommend we have more easier way to search the emails, have dashboards that are more relevant. for example, multiple charts on dashboard have differnt time-frame and are opened by default with such settings. Its kind of weird to see this. Another thing is their email alert on usage of the tokens is not well formatted :) I raised this concern a couple of times.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have not had any issues with Elastic Email that have required reaching out to support, so I can't speak to the quality of their customer support. The help documents were well written and presented, though, and I would imagine that anyone with issues would receive satisfactory assistance in a timely manner.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Email elastic is a cost-effective, fast, and reliable platform for sending bulk emails and promoting campaigns, it provides good features even for the new user, while Blaze Verify pricing is a bit high, and a new user would not be able to access all the features. Hence clearly, Elastic email leads the position when compared to Blaze Verify.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
