Engine Yard vs. SUSE Rancher
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Engine Yard | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Engine Yard is a platform-as-a-service solution allowing developers to plan, build, deploy, and manage applications in the cloud. Engine Yard also provides services for deployment, managing AWS, supporting databases, and microservices & container development. | $800 Per Month Per Cluster |
SUSE Rancher | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Developed by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost… | $7,594.99 per year up to 500 nodes |
| Engine Yard | SUSE Rancher | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Engine Yard | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 16 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| Engine Yard | SUSE Rancher | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Engine Yard | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | Kubernetes Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Engine Yard | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.8 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Engine Yard | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |


