Diligent Entities vs. EntityKeeper

I would recommend Diligent Entities for organisations with 20 or more entities as a valuable asset for ensuring secure and streamlined entity management. I would probably not recommend the product for companies with only a few entities, as the solution is quite expensive and it is geared towards larger, structured organisations, particularly those with international companies.

Incentivized

• Integration of Single Sign On with your organisational security measures.
• Creation of new tabs for entity information headings.
• Tailoring of data fields for business requirements.

Incentivized

• The process for issuing and cancelling shares could be made easier.
• At times, the data is slow to update.
• There are some click-through fields that aren't necessary.

Incentivized

Whilst most of the features in Diligent are of a high standard, there are some functions that could be made more user-friendly, to enable greater use of the product by more senior managers who may not have the time, coding, or other technical skills required to work out some of the functionality.

Incentivized

Whilst Ontra and Kuberno are both excellent products, the cost of each was prohibitive when compared with Diligent Entities, and neither product integrated with the Australian Securities Investment Commission company portal for lodgement purposes.

Incentivized

• Diligent Entities has enabled us to automate entity management.
• Diligent Entities has improved security via single sign on.
• Diligent Entities has improved entity reporting.

Incentivized