IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Epicor CMS
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor CMS
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Epicor CMS
IFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
10.01 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.01 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
API for custom integration
10.02 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.02 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
10.02 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.02 Ratings
9.75 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards
10.01 Ratings
8.55 Ratings
Standard reports
9.02 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Custom reports
9.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.5
2 Ratings
21% above category average
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Accounts payable
10.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Accounts receivable
10.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.02 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.02 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
10.02 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Standardized Processes
10.02 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.02 Ratings
9.25 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Location management
10.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.4
2 Ratings
6% above category average
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Pricing
10.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Credit card processing
10.01 Ratings
8.64 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.02 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.02 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Billing Management
10.02 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.02 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.02 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Period Close
10.02 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.4
1 Ratings
2% below category average
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
5.01 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
7.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
5.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
34% above category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.01 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
10.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
10.01 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
10.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
2 Ratings
21% above category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
10.02 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Contract Authoring
10.01 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Contract Repository
10.01 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
10.02 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Supplier Management
10.02 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.3
1 Ratings
8% above category average
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Control Management
7.01 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
7.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.01 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
1 Ratings
23% above category average
IFS Applications
7.7
4 Ratings
10% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
9.01 Ratings
8.32 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.01 Ratings
7.63 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Production Process Design
10.02 Ratings
9.23 Ratings
Production Management
8.02 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.02 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Work Execution
8.02 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.02 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
31% above category average
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Forecasting
10.02 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Inventory Planning
10.02 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
10.02 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.1
1 Ratings
9% above category average
IFS Applications
4.7
4 Ratings
44% below category average
Proposal Management
8.01 Ratings
8.23 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.01 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Epicor CMS and IFS Applications
Through daily use of Epicor, it is apparent that at it's basest level, it favors a stock-based manufacturing model (your company has established SKUs and Production works to replenish stock levels when a KANBAN or other system triggers a re-order point). While it excels at that, ours is a custom-order industrial manufacturing model (we produce to customer specification or repeat orders), meaning there is no stocking of finished components, only the materials it takes to make them. It's taken some finesse (and the purchase of additional modules) to get to where we need to be.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Epicor CMS had a UI that was deemed more aesthetically pleasing than (subjective, naturally!) Sage, for which we attended a presentation/orientation session. Our Team felt Epicor (once outfitted with the necessary add-ons) would be better suited in the long run for longevity and ongoing support (especially considering our outgoing software was Sage).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Epicor has necessitated dedicated "Staging" personnel, as multi-line orders are generated as individual orders to Production/Manufacturing, meaning someone must ensure they all come together upon completion prior to shipping.
Payroll and Accounts Payable/Receivable have noted improved integration and tracking compared to the legacy/outgoing software (Business Vision).
Inventory tracking is vastly improved over the outgoing software, with detailed reports/tracking of remnant/off-cut materials, which benefits Material Handlers as well as the Purchasing Manager for keeping the inventory budget in line with targets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info