eQube®-AG vs. SwaggerHub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
eQube®-AG
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
eQube®-AG, API Gateway, manages APIs through creation, publication, monitoring, maintenance, and security. Its interface offers a governance framework for API lifecycle management, allowing flexibility in defining security policies at the organizational level and applying rules to each API. API consumption monitoring is made easy with built-in BI dashboards, facilitating rapid issue identification and resolution. The API definition capability (REST, OData, Web services) is integrated with eQube®…N/A
SwaggerHub
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SwaggerHub is a platform for API design and documentation with OpenAPI. Whether it’s push generating an API’s design and code to source control hosts, deploying the API to API Management platforms, or triggering a Jenkins build, SwaggerHub boasts a host of integrations. Faster, Standardized API Design Design APIs in an editor that is built for efficiency without any loss in design…
$75
per month per user
Pricing
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team 3 - Annual
$75
per month per user
Team 3 - Monthly
$90
per month per user
Team 5 - Annual
$125
per month per user
Team 5 - Monthly
$150
per month per user
Team 10 - Annual
$250
per month per user
Team 10 - Monthly
$300
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
Considered Both Products
eQube®-AG

No answer on this topic

SwaggerHub
Chose SwaggerHub
We have had SwaggerHub for as long as I have been with the company, so I am not sure why SwaggerHub was selected compared to other similar tools.
Chose SwaggerHub
We liked the SwaggerHub UI & the integrations it has with the several cloud API gateways. Though postman has some other great features like the ability to write test cases & execute them, SwaggerUI was more convenient to document & share them.
Chose SwaggerHub
The only other product we looked at was Postman. But we liked the SwaggerHub UI & the integrations it has with the AWS API gateway. Though Postman has some other great features like the ability to write test cases & execute them, SwaggerUI was more convenient to document & …
Chose SwaggerHub
SwaggerHub wins hands down when it comes to RESTFul services/APIs. It's more user friendly, simpler, and can be part of the application library. SoapUI is only better for SOAP or web services.
Chose SwaggerHub
SwaggerHub is the best for what it can do in terms of API management and monitoring, compared to Postman, which is more like tools for everything (testing, monitoring, mock request, etc.). If you are overwhelmed with the number of API endpoints that you have and are finding it …
Features
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
eQube®-AG
-
Ratings
SwaggerHub
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
API access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
API usage data00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
API user onboarding00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
API versioning00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Usage billing and payments00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
eQube®-AGSwaggerHub
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We use SwaggerHub to design API endpoint and documentation for our microservices architecture system. It's working really great for us to be able to collaborate more easily on developing API in our team. It also can test our API endpoint which makes an integration test easier when we deploy changes to the API, especially for non-developers/QA.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Treating the design as documentation ensures that we have consistent and well defined APIs
  • API consumers can export the swagger definition or code stubs to use within their development environment
  • We can iterate through multiple versions of a definition privately before making a version publicly available
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Swagger Editor can be bit more user friendly by providing the means to persist different projects as part of user profiles
  • Swagger UI's testing capability or means to test APIs can be improved
  • Swagger UI clients can be added as part of Spring ecosystem
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We have had SwaggerHub for as long as I have been with the company, so I am not sure why SwaggerHub was selected compared to other similar tools
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Faster API development lifecycle.
  • Reduced discussion time when building a new vital API endpoint.
  • Complete documentation which makes the new team member onboarding process easier.
Read full review
ScreenShots

eQube®-AG Screenshots

Screenshot of Deployment Canvas | eQube®-AGScreenshot of API Performance Observability | eQube®-AGScreenshot of API Inventory | eQube®-AG

SwaggerHub Screenshots

Screenshot of Faster, Standardized API Design