Espresso is a test framework used to write Android UI tests, and part of the Android SDK. The Espresso API encourages test authors to think in terms of what a user might do while interacting with the application - locating UI elements and interacting with them. At the same time, the framework prevents direct access to activities and views of the application because holding on to these objects and operating on them off the UI thread is a major source of test flakiness.
$0
Tallyfy
Score8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Tallyfy is designed to eliminate flowcharts and aims to focus on enabling anyone to do and track any process in the easiest possible way. This solution enables users to track the status of many processes going on at the same time - within a real-time dashboard. Examples of repeatable processes include client onboarding, customer success, guided sales and compliance checks. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution collects valuable data about the effectiveness and…
$15
per user, per month
Pricing
Espresso
Tallyfy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$15.00
per user, per month
Professional
$30.00
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Espresso
Tallyfy
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$500 Per organization
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Espresso
Tallyfy
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Espresso and Tallyfy
Feature
Espresso
-
Ratings
Tallyfy
10.0
1 Ratings
26% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Espresso and Tallyfy
Feature
Espresso
-
Ratings
Tallyfy
10.0
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Espresso and Tallyfy
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good for customizing an onboarding process to help ensure a smooth process, and setting up a contract for electronic signature in an easier way than customizing an editable PDF and uploading it to any number of eSign platforms. I've integrated Tallyfy, using Zapier, to Webmerge and Signnow, to get the result I was looking for, but there are plenty of ways Tallyfy can be implemented.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Easily to collect data to serve any number of purposes.
We use it to collect data about our clients and to collect the data necessary to customize the contract and the customer experience.
Tallyfy Webhooks then allow us to push that data out to other platforms, etc, so I've been able to create a solution that completes the document and sends it out for electronic signature with the click of a button... once the data has been collected.
Create drop-downs, radio selections, checkboxes, short and long text paragraphs, etc. Even uploading documents and saving them directly to your favorite cloud storage, such as Drive or Dropbox.
Manage the process from one team member to the next, depending on responsibility.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As Espresso works on the ideal thread if the threads are not handled properly by the developing team it can lead to challenges in the execution of your tests.
Depends more on the developer's code
we cannot develop tests as individual frameworks, we share the repository with developers.
We need to be cautious while making changes in the tests, as we share same repository
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I'd like more control over the view. For example, some way to condense the view so that more data can be seen at once. Currently, in my opinion, it is just a little too large or blown up, but this may be a petty request.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As our app is complete on Android Espresso is the best choice over Appium Fewer efforts in Espresso over Appium, as Espresso provides some built-in library to perform the operation. Easy to use, Espresso is very easy to understand and we can perform operations with very little code. Developers can contribute, as they have good command over Java and Kotin languages and also use Espresso for unit testing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info