TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    eVoice

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AFor business owners, eVoice is presented as an affordable, reliable and flexible phone system, by J2 Global / Ziff Davis. eVoice now includes services from the former Onebox, which was also a J2 Global brand.N/A

    Keras

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AKeras is a Python deep learning libraryN/A
    Pricing
    eVoiceKeras
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    eVoiceKeras
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    eVoiceKeras
    Call Management
    Comparison of Call Management features of eVoice and Keras
    Feature
    eVoice
    8.8
    1 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Keras
    -
    Ratings
    Answering rules9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call recording9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call park8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call screening9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Message alerts9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    VoIP system collaboration
    Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of eVoice and Keras
    Feature
    eVoice
    8.8
    1 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Keras
    -
    Ratings
    Video conferencing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio conferencing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video screen sharing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instant messaging9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile apps
    Comparison of Mobile apps features of eVoice and Keras
    Feature
    eVoice
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Keras
    -
    Ratings
    Mobile app for iOS9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile app for Android9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    eVoiceKeras
    Small Businesses
    CallFire
    Score9.7 out of 10
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Fuze
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    eVoiceKeras
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.1
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    eVoiceKeras
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Ziff Davis Inc
    If you are looking for a strong product that is highly customizable, Onebox is a great choice. It can be difficult to navigate, but almost every feature you would need is included somewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras is quite perfect, if the aim is to build the standard Deep Learning model, and materialize it to serve the real business use case, while it is not suitable if the purpose is for research and a lot of non-standard try out and customization are required, in that case either directly goes to low level TensorFlow API or Pytorch
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Low Pricing.
    • Ease of use.
    • Professional voicemail.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • One of the reason to use Keras is that it is easy to use. Implementing neural network is very easy in this, with just one line of code we can add one layer in the neural network with all it's configurations.
    • It provides lot of inbuilt thing like cov2d, conv2D, maxPooling layers. So it makes fast development as you don't need to write everything on your own. It comes with lot of data processing libraries in it like one hot encoder which also makes your development easy and fast.
    • It also provides functionality to develop models on mobile device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • The scheduling is very granular, but the interface for setting up the schedule isn't the easiest to navigate.
    • I would like the ability to copy or clone schedules. We have 3 different schedules on three different hunt groups and when there are changes to be made, I would like to be able to make the change on one schedule and copy that for another hunt group.
    • The interface for the users to change some of their settings (password, phone, email, etc) isn't very user friendly. I usually have to walk users through changes, and at that point, it is easier for me to just make the changes myself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • As it is a kind of wrapper library it won't allow you to modify everything of its backend
    • Unlike other deep learning libraries, it lacks a pre-defined trained model to use
    • Errors thrown are not always very useful for debugging. Sometimes it is difficult to know the root cause just with the logs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    I am giving this rating depending on my experience so far with Keras, I didn't face any issue far. I would like to recommend it to the new developers.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Keras have really good support along with the strong community over the internet. So in case you stuck, It won't so hard to get out from it.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Ziff Davis Inc
    I was not an employee when Onebox was selected, but I have used Avaya and Nortel PBXs in the past and while it is not as powerful, it has a lot of great features and a much lower cost of entry.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras is good to develop deep learning models. As compared to TensorFlow, it's easy to write code in Keras. You have more power with TensorFlow but also have a high error rate because you have to configure everything by your own. And as compared to MATLAB, I will always prefer Keras as it is easy and powerful as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Value for money.
    • Great option regarding ROI.
    • It creates a better way to connect.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Easy and faster way to develop neural network.
    • It would be much better if it is available in Java.
    • It doesn't allow you to modify the internal things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots