Expedience Software vs. Loopio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Expedience Software
Score 4.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Expedience Proposal Software automates sales proposals, RFP & RFI responses (even Excel RFPs!), FAQs, DDQs, SOWs, questionnaires, PPT presentations, and more. Based in Microsoft Word, Expedience is the proposal software you already know how to use. For over 25 years, Expedience has helped sales and proposal writers create highly-tailored, branded, persuasive proposals. According to the vendor, Expedience is the leading solution for financial and asset management, healthcare, legal,…N/A
Loopio
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Loopio is a Toronto-based RFP response software provider that helps companies streamline their process for RFPs, DDQs, and Security Questionnaires. Loopio’s RFP response software is for RFIs, Security Questionnaires, DDQs, and sales proposals.N/A
Pricing
Expedience SoftwareLoopio
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Expedience SoftwareLoopio
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Expedience SoftwareLoopio
Considered Both Products
Expedience Software

No answer on this topic

Loopio
Chose Loopio
At the time we evaluated both tools Loopio had a better pricing structure and the "magic" functionality was one of the main reasons we went with it.
Chose Loopio
Before Loopio, we had someone who coordinated responses through email and copying from old PDFs/responses. We didn't look at any competitors to Loopio. No need after seeing the demo!
Chose Loopio
Loopio had competitive pricing and the feature set we needed to remove roadblocks/inefficiencies in our current RFP process.
Chose Loopio
I haven't used any other similar products
Chose Loopio
There aren't any competitors like it in the same space. You can build bespoke machine learning processes or go with a huge vendor like Archer, but Loopio is in a class of one. We really like the features at the price point. You get good value by significantly reducing the …
Best Alternatives
Expedience SoftwareLoopio
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Responsive
Responsive
Score 8.9 out of 10
Responsive
Responsive
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Responsive
Responsive
Score 8.9 out of 10
Responsive
Responsive
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Expedience SoftwareLoopio
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Expedience SoftwareLoopio
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I use Loopio specifically for RFP's mostly. I think it is a great and adequate tool for this and much of what I think that needs to improve are not large needle movers for me since the software as a whole is fantastic. It is very easy to upload an RFP into Loopio and begin answering those questions or pulling from previously answered questions. I also will use Loopio for large client proposals and I often use the "search functionality within Loopio to see if I can find answers to clients questions. I like that I can also pull images from Loopio as well and often use those visualizations in my proposals.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Ease of use - a few minutes' tutorial is enough for a newcomer to start using the tool.
  • Handy options - i.e. support in searching for the right answer
  • Often meaningful & useful releases
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Having the ability to directly connect responses in multiple languages.
  • Ability to set up more people in the review cycle (we typically have a responder, and at least 2 reviewers).
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Usability is good but falls short of excellent. The interface is clean and well organized. They clearly spent some time working on the UI and took some feedback from focus groups to help keep it tidy. On a few occasions, we have experienced a little bit of lag while updating the question database. I'd like to see just a little faster response time on a consistent basis.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They're very supportive and reply in a timely manner. Whenever I contacted the support I received a helpful reply that actually solved my issue. Quite often when my team suggested an improvement that would simplify and speed up our work it happened not long after which is perfect for us.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
  • User friendly--very simple
  • Reviews of libraries can be assigned
  • Non-named user licenses can be used by various people
  • Close Loop--changes can be added to library with just a few clicks
  • View text in library and can copy content
  • Reporting on reviews and usage and projects
  • Help center and assigned representative
  • Library duplicates functionality
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It has helped us keep data up to date and therefore provide better answers.
  • The amount of time it takes us to compile RFPs has decreased tremendously giving everyone more time to focus on their main roles.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Expedience Software Screenshots

Screenshot of Expedience Content SearchScreenshot of Expedience Search ResultsScreenshot of Expedience GalleryScreenshot of Expedience Weighted ResultsScreenshot of Expedience Duplicate to Excel