F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. IBM Load Balancer
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | F5 states that the "brain" of the BIG-IP platform, Local Traffic Manager (LTM) intelligently manages network traffic so applications are always fast, available, and secure. | N/A |
IBM Load Balancer | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Load Balancer supports load balance of traffic among servers to improve uptime and easily scae applications by adding or removing servers, with minimal disruption to traffic flows. | N/A |
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | IBM Load Balancer | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | IBM Load Balancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 48 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 46 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 37 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 39 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | IBM Load Balancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure Application Gateway Score8.8 out of 10 | ![]() Azure Application Gateway Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NetScaler Score8 out of 10 | NetScaler Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | IBM Load Balancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.6 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.7 | - |
| Usability | 9.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | IBM Load Balancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |


