F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. VMware NSX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
F5 states that the "brain" of the BIG-IP platform, Local Traffic Manager (LTM) intelligently manages network traffic so applications are always fast, available, and secure.N/A
VMware NSX
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
VMware NSX is network virtualization technology. VMware NSX is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.N/A
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)VMware NSX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)VMware NSX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)VMware NSX
Considered Both Products
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Chose F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) was the most robust and highest performing ADC product.
VMware NSX

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)VMware NSX
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)VMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(30 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)VMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
I mean the only reason we changed away from it was price and it just simply had to do with the licensing that Citrix was offering on the NetScalers. They had basically an all you can eat consumption license that we were easily inside of with all of our VDI usage, whereas with F5 we had to buy the hardware and we had to license the software. Any place you need to actually do traffic balancing at scale, it's a fantastic product. I couldn't recommend it highly enough. There's just some things that hardware SSL offload and hardware load balancing just simply can't be equal that I don't know if there's a better product on the market for that.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
With proper design, VMware NSX can and should be deployed to virtually any VMware virtualization environment, but the deployment should be tailored to the needs of that environment. There isn't really a one size fits all deployment design for all environments. That versatility is what provides its greatest strength to a business.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Sure. It does load balancing fantastically. I mean, it's an industry standard product for that. We also use it for TLS offload for applications. Those are the two main use cases for that. We do also use some of the I rules for traffic filtering. We've used that in some of the external facing services. It does a really nice job with that. It's a little bit complicated sometimes and some of the Cipher Suite stuff is interesting.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • End to end encryption on the wire.
  • Micro-segmentation.
  • Integrates well with existing VMWare environment.
  • Integrates well with our existing network.
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • Some of the stuff you have to dive into the CLI to really use, I'm going to reach back to the previous employer for this. So I had a much greater degree of involvement with it at that point in time for, I was the crypto guy at the company and I had to design all the cipher suites that we actually implemented on our front end banking products. So in order to do that, I had to dive into it, download all the Cipher suites, figure out the actual order of operation for them, how they were selected because I wanted to design the Cipher Suites to actually provide a specific customer experience for the types of connections that our customers were likely to initiate. Getting at that information was a giant PITA. It was poorly documented at the time. I'm not sure if it's documented any better now. Every time the software changed or got upgraded, made your version, I'd have to do it all over again because the upgrades to the stack, which looked like it was based on open SSL, but it was heavily modified with a different syntax. Oh yay. That's fun too. So I had to write giant documents describing all of the ciphers that I was designing for this because it just kept changing all the time. So I didn't care for that aspect of it. Traffic management does a great job for that.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Interoperability in multi-vendor environments
  • Advanced networking and packet acceleration options can be improved
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
F5 has always been one of the best products we have in the data center. We had few issues with the BUG and Code upgrades but the main use cases for F5 was always top notch. From High availability to Globally load balancing applications across multiple data centers and muti cloud environments.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Usability
F5
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is very easy to use. Building each application is straightforward forward and the help function and now with the new AI assistant soon to be available, it is going to be easier than ever to be able to understand and implement each application.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
F5
Good after sales support if one purchased direct support from F5.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
F5
Easy to implement if one had attended F5 Training for Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
F5
F5 is doing its specialized function. There is no other product that can beat them. We are extremely happy with the product. Especially on load balancing, traffic redirecting TLS encryption, and SNI modification. We will continue to explore F5's product, especially on the public cloud side. e.g. NGINX.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
We use both Cisco ACI and VMware NSX, and while they have different strengths and capabilities, I would recommend VMware NSX, as it can be used in all VMware environments, without costly physical infrastructure changes. Cisco ACI provides some of the same capabilities, but not all. It's focus relies on physical networking changes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • The F5 LTMs have had a very positive impact on our business objectives. Are websites are very heavily utilized with users all over the globe.
  • The F5 LTMs have provided a mechanism for making difficult applications work with our current infrastructure like MS teams.
  • The F5 LTMs are very good at customizing irules to deal with everyday issues.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Ability to move workloads more easily with the ability to stretch/move networks across multiple physical locations.
  • The added flexibility allows you to expedite tech refreshes since you're no longer constrained by the hardware.
Read full review
ScreenShots