F5 Distributed Cloud API Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
F5's Distributed Cloud API Security provides discovery and deep insights from use of AI/ML. It can be used to block API attacks in real time and eliminate vulnerabilities at their source. The SaaS-based portal enables users to manage and go deep for threat analytics, forensics, and troubleshooting of modern applications.N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for Azure, on-premises, and multicloud (Amazon AWS and Google GCP) resources.N/A
Pricing
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Considered Both Products
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Azure API Management, Imperva API Security and FortiWeb
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
So far so good. Results from a lab test show good metrics.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
We ran a short POC with Salt. Its data classification and attack replay features were impressive. What held us back was the limited support for hybrid deployments and poor integration into our CI/CD pipelines, as F5 did.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Not Applicable
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
I love it
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
I think F5 Distributed Cloud API Security is better than most.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
I believe F5 requires much more time and features to level barracuda cloud waas, but I think F5 will surpass the way Big IP has done easily.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Our organization chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security because, in our opinion, Implementation was easier for F5 Distributed Cloud API Security than Akamai API Gateway.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
For F5, there is no company that can compete for security protection.
So far, F5 has the strongest security session level provided to the market.
Also F5 Distributed Cloud API Security is inter connect to all different environment, which make thing way easier to operate and …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
It offers threat intelligence feeds and machine learning capabilities to detect and block emerging threats.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Noname Security and Akamai API Gateway
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Ease of use/administration
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Akamai Edge DNS, Azure DNS and F5 BIG-IP DNS
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
OWASP ZAP
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
We had before F5 so naturall way seams to have F5 Distributed Cloud API with Security assurance.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security was worlds better in terms of secureness and ease of use.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Because we do a profound review of functionalities, configurations, and security operations from our soft team's perspective. The best one that adapts to our actual architecture, and I mean it's so negative for us because we are more prone to Microsoft products, was Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Competitive-wise, we've looked at Palo Alto and Proofpoint. So we selected Microsoft Defender for Cloud on the basis it was linking closer to the identity, but we've had to also, I said earlier that we've aligned with Palo Alto for the secondary tech to look at it from a device …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Barracuda goes neck to neck with Microsoft Defender for Cloud in the anti-spam, anti-phishing email suite. But why I chose this product is because again, it's very well embedded with Microsoft technology, and we're a Microsoft shop, and it works well for us to use that product …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Although it meets our needs, we decided to go for it because of the confidence we already had in the other tools.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
We haven't really, I mean we've used Google's options, but not really. We've just gotten demos really.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
We were one of the first ones to deploy when Microsoft released it, so it's hard to compare, but what we hear from competitors, the fact that Microsoft can see the full ecosystem using this product makes it a lot better as compared to using a third party tool. So it's the ease …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
I was trained on AWS originally, but I'm starting to Azure more and more in Microsoft.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Evaluated between cost. I just think it integrates better with the Microsoft stack and I mean, I think just cost from just that perspective and being the one pane of glass, I think that's enough.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Had some coverage gaps and was more expensive compared to native Azure security controls, such as Defender for Cloud.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Trend Micro Cloud One - Application Security, AWS Security Hub and Wiz
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
I believe Microsoft Defender for Cloud stacks up well against the other tools we looked at. It is native to the Azure platform and provides the same insights as the other tools. We selected Microsoft Defender for Cloud because it integrates well with the Azure resources and …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Defender is a robust cloud security solution, but Prisma is Comprehensive cloud-native security platform with full lifecycle security
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a better range of functionality across the board. In terms of database, reliability, security solutions.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
We use Microsoft Defender for Cloud as an integration of Defender 365 and collect all the incident into one dashboard.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offered a more integrated and comprehensive solution for our multi-cloud environment, integrating well with our security and compliance needs
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is definitely the choice with the latest market trend and attacks that are currently happening. Microsoft has been able to safe guard a lot after the recent serious attacks happening globally in the digital world. There is a trust in this software …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Forcepoint ONE, Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager and Tenable Nessus
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
There is the several ways to protect the applications and lot more tools available in the market. Most commonly we used Crowd strike Falcon for endpoint detection and response capabilities. McAfee endpoint protection also provide broad range of security features. Best …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
We used to use Symantec and McAfee. It's been mostly defenders since, gosh, the last eight to 10 years. So we're a small organization. We don't have a lot of folks, so single-painted glass is really important to be able to see the whole environment in a single place. And the …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
When we purchase this data fund, we check with not competition and we decided to purchase these tools because it's strong and we have a good relationship with Microsoft.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Azure and Microsoft 365
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
It is very good in comparison to other products that we have used. Its price is very effective and attractive, and it also provides good security policies. threat intelligence is also good and user protection is also very much better, and it also serves new updates as and when …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
It provides great Integration with the existing resources. As we don’t have to worry about the compatibility of the product with our resources.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Defender has the benefit of all the integration, included licensing for defender for server and being able to start small and grow.

Wiz licensing was too expensive, lacking features like an EDR making it a less favorable solution
Features
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
API Security
Comparison of API Security features of Product A and Product B
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
-
Ratings
Data Protection8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Audit Logging8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Input Validation7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Filtering8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Denial of Service (DoS) Protection8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Notification and Alerts8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
API Key Management8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-origin Resource Sharing (CORS) Protection8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 Distributed Cloud API SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
I believe it covers everything related to the applications' security aspects, but there are a lot of improvements that need to be made. For example, better granular controls like bot categories listed on the distributed console and a granular URL-based control for the rate-limiting option are needed.
Read full review
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very good at allowing users to see how their Azure environment is secure through the secure score. The recommendations are an excellent source of the controls that should be in place to ensure a secure environment. There needs to be more protection and features for data security.
Read full review
Pros
  • It auto-discovers APIs, even the ones engineers forget to document. Then profiles them without needing changes to our codebase.
  • Shadow API exposure.
  • It's pretty decent at abnormal behavior detection.
Read full review
  • Automation is crucial to managing sprawl and the additional complexity that comes with it. SOC management workbooks and process automation give significant flexibility.
  • The Security posture score and Security Alerts are neatly centralized and offer me crucial information quickly.
  • Defender for Cloud avoids the common compromise of simplicity for completeness (former Azure Security Center). The security warnings and advice go into great detail while remaining current and useful.
Read full review
Cons
  • More accurate detection of advanced persistent threats (APTs) targeting APIs.
  • A greater emphasis on checking APIs' schema and contract may prevent them from accepting misconfigurations or malicious input.
  • More customized, dynamic, and targeted protection for high-value APIs or high-risk user groups.
Read full review
  • UI/UX. It can get a little messy when navigating around with all the flyouts in the Azure portal which can be frustrating, particularly when under time pressure.
  • The query languages for the queries and workbooks are another language that needs to be learned - it would be nice to have kept it closer to T-SQL or something like that to minimize the need to learn new syntax.
  • Adding cost estimations to the security recommendations would really improve the experience.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security provides robust API protection with solid threat detection, excellent visibility, and seamless integration into our architecture
Read full review
It is a great product that integrates nicely when running an Azure platform and even multi-cloud environment. Not looking for point-solutions but a suite that answers most requirements. It is very comfortable being able to use KQL, workbooks and automation that is native to the azure platform
Read full review
Usability
Great product. Working with F5 for many years, we found the products F5 provided are all cutting edge technology. Although in F5 Distributed Cloud API Security we still have a lot to find out, but we believe this experience will be very good. Especially on the security side. Trust in F5.
Read full review
My visibility is limited because I'm only doing very small pieces of what the overall org does. And also, we have limitations on what we're allowed to use. It's not like we get a new product as users or leadership level users, and everything is on, and we can just do whatever we want. We're very restricted in what we can use any tooling within the org because of the different levels of regulatory constraints we have, because of just the nature of who we are inherently. So that's why. I don't think it's necessarily the product. I think it's more or less of what we're able to do with the product.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Always available
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The UI is cloud-native and generally responsive. Report generation is easy Integrates with cloud providers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Lo hacemos mediante un partner We did it through a partner
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security is our company looking forward product. With more and more API is using in both on prem, private cloud, public cloud and multi cloud environment, we as a financial institution, we are keep into the security settings to protect the information. That's the main reason we want to use this product.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We ran a short POC with Salt. Its data classification and attack replay features were impressive. What held us back was the limited support for hybrid deployments and poor integration into our CI/CD pipelines, as F5 did.
Read full review
Barracuda goes neck to neck with Microsoft Defender for Cloud in the anti-spam, anti-phishing email suite. But why I chose this product is because again, it's very well embedded with Microsoft technology, and we're a Microsoft shop, and it works well for us to use that product and have better visibility versus Barracuda being just an offshore, just a single product versus Microsoft Defender for Cloud being blended with other applications.
Read full review
Scalability
Centralized policy management: You can manage API security policies consistently across locations without duplicating effort, which supports scaling.


API discovery and monitoring at scale: It automatically discovers APIs and monitors them in real time across large and complex environments.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • F5 Distributed Cloud API Security mitigates many API-related security threats, including bot attacks, DDoS, data breaches, and unauthorized access attempts.
  • F5 Distributed Cloud API Security uses robust threat detection, machine learning, and real-time monitoring for speedier identification.
  • Reductions in security events result in fewer breaches, reduced downtime, and lower attack remediation costs.
Read full review
  • Ensuring compliance with data protection regulations can prevent costly fines and legal issues, positively impacting ROI.
  • Effective cloud resource protection can optimize cloud spending and resource utilization, ultimately reducing cloud infrastructure costs.
  • The subscription costs associated with Defender for Cloud can add to an organization's operational expenses, impacting ROI.
  • Smaller organizations may find the feature set and complexity of Defender for Cloud unnecessary, potentially overinvesting in security solutions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

F5 Distributed Cloud API Security Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of Remediation of critical issues in codeScreenshot of Cloud security benchmark mapped to industry FramworksScreenshot of Prioritization of critical risks with contextual threat analysisScreenshot of Workload protectionScreenshot of Unified DevOps VisibilityScreenshot of Visualizations to improve security posture proactively