F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) vs. Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Uplynk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF leverages F5's Advanced WAF technology, delivering WAF-as-a-Service and combining signature- and behavior-based protection for web applications. It acts as an intermediate proxy to inspect application requests and responses to block and mitigate a broad spectrum of risks stemming from the OW ASP Top 10, persistent and coordinated threat campaigns, bots, and layer 7 DoS.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Uplynk
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Uplynk, formerly Edgio and formerly Limelight Networks, offers their global edge network to bring data closer to every user, delivering content faster, safer and easier. It boasts more than 7,000 global interconnections to last-mile networks.N/A
Pricing
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Considered Multiple Products
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
We use bigIP primarily for on-premises infrastructure and protection against volumetric DDoS attacks, including F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall).

El bigIP lo utilizamos más para infra on premise, proteccion de ataques volumetricos de DDoS que inculye F5 …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
I prefer F5 Distributed Cloud over BIG-IP is due to we have multiple BIG-IPs, and login in to each one and administer them individually is time consuming. Versus maintaining visibility globally on just one dashboard. In addition, the WAAP services in Distributed Cloud is …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
DDOS protection and leadership in addressing advance threats
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
In our opinion, F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) is just better
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Avoid single point of failures avoided with F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall).
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Easy to use, clean interface and Dashboard. SaaS offering, easy to onboard. Do not have to worry about upgrades and updates as this is taken care by F5. No worries about operating system bugs and fixes.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
it is a market leader among the security products that we have evaluated.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
existing footprint
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
F5 continues to be the leader in our mind, offering the most robust and powerful WAF on the market that meets our needs.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
F5 DC WAF fit into our ecosystem better as we were already an F5 shop
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
As we are already a Big-IP shop, this products fits well with the existing ecosystem. At the same time, this is cost effective and easy to deploy
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Just as easy and flexible as Akamai products, but definitely needs time to build the overall coverage compared to Akamai CDN network
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Akamai Prolexic, Akamai Ion, Akamai CDN, Akamai Bot Manager, FortiWeb, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and NGINX
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
ModSecurity (open-source) and F5 (commercial, including NGINX App Protect) are Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) protecting against Layer 7 attacks. ModSecurity offers a free, flexible, OWASP-based solution, while F5 provides enterprise-grade performance, advanced automation, …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Imperva Application Firewall
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
we selected F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) for its strong threat protection centralized management ,and effective support and for hybrid cloud enviroments
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Cloudflare, Akamai App & API Protector and Imperva Application Firewall
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Not bad, however there were services that were provided by DOS arrest that are automated through F5 cloud and would require attention and expertise to mimic. It does offer the same but must be configured not offered as a bundled configuration.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Zscaler Internet Access, Zscaler Private Access, Netskope CASB and Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
We considered Cloudflare in the first place because it came with strong appeal upfront, it's easy to deploy especially for small web apps. We even ran a few pilot tests with it during client rollouts but settled on F5 Distributed Cloud WAF instead. Main reason being its …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Imperva Application Firewall
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
They are very similar and protect pretty much against the same attacks. F5 though is easier to manage.
Oracle WebLogic Server
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I have only used WebSphere for an evaluation period but I felt it was even harder to learn and it's cost was going to be bigger in the long run. Oracle WebLogic Server was more like the middle ground for what we needed at the time, both in terms of costs and learning curve.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
As mentioned earlier we didn't choose Oracle WebLogic Server, but received it as part of the application we bought. After using it for a few years we found it to be a stable product that has a bit of a learning curve compared to Microsoft IIS but is as stable and maybe even …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I wasn't involved in selecting the server we were using but in our team we've made some efforts to improve the local deployment process by trying some other Applicational servers too.
Apache Tomcat was a more lightweight solution for sure, and it coped well with our applications …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Application Server is very robust and has good features and stability. It is a very sought-after tool for deploying many kinds of applications.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like apache tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We have no option because we need it to use Oracle Forms, but we have used Jboss and tomcat in other projects and Weblogic is more stable.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and IBM WebSphere Application Server on Cloud
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is a leading server side container. It is far superior than IBM's WebSphere application server, JBOSS or Tomcat server. The easiness of using Oracle's weblogic application server is much user friendly and also it has great support and user …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Application Server gains its reputation from the performance, easy of maintenance, to be compared with the competitor solutions. However, Weblogic is "all-in-on" solution, sometimes it is too fat for some business needs that only requires part of the full …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
The main competitor is Wildfly and Websphere. The choice it's all about the bundled cost regarding the chosen OS and Java vendor. All three are almost the same in terms of performance and features. An exceptional alternative from the OSS ecosystem is Payara. Payra has some …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is much more stable when compared to opensource application servers like Oracle GlassFish Server or Apache Tomcat. Coming to JBoss Enterprise Application Server, Oracle WebLogic Application Server has better support with most of the cloud …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I used them in different contexts.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat requires a lot of out-of-the-box set-up that is difficult to work with, especially when it comes to production-ready configurations. The only advantage it has over Oracle WLS is that it's free, which is probably why many commercial server products are bundled with …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache tomcat is used by the group of developers in our organization but the major student ERP production systems do run on WebLogic due to its feature-rich nature and stability. Although the cost is considered a hindrance to its wider use.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We use Oracle Commerce Cloud as well.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Best support of JEE specifications.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We are using OBIEE application and when we install an application it is installed automatically with the application. We selected the WebLogic Server for better administration and maintenance of the application. It is very important for us to keep our production application up …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
WebSphere is another major contender and they have pitching and are more updated/streamlined. I still prefer WebLogic from an administrator standpoint. Support is much better and there are more options for finding answers to issues or new features.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss EAP is good and open source. We chose Oracle WebLogic because we are using Oracle products like Oracle Enterprise Manager and it's very easy to integrate WebLogic with it. Also, for our mission critical applications, we wanted an application server with great …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Compared to the alternatives, Weblogic is on the heavier side and requires more configuration to get it running. Instance startup time is also relatively long, but this could be due to the application size deployed on the server. Licensing cost for WebLogic would also be higher …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We tested Red Hat JBoss. Then we decided to use WebLogic because of support issues we had with the other.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Performance is better with heavy workloads.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat, Oracle GlassFish Server and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Uplynk
Chose Uplynk
We have moved our live webcasting and archived hosting away from LLNW. There were some technical hurdles that we could not overcome, even with their technical support. For our business model, LLNW's fee structure was not competitive with others in their space. We do …
Features
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
Uplynk
-
Ratings
IDE support00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)Oracle WebLogic ServerUplynk
Likelihood to Recommend
So a lot of companies that have a digital side and they have a lot of applications in the cloud, this is one of those areas that it can protect the net so it can lock 'em down, it'll build a baseline so you understand what that application's doing. So if it sees something not normal, it'll get protected against that.
Read full review
I see Oracle WebLogic Application Server being appropriate when an application needs several different data sources and messaging providers configured and accessible, with a configured level of control of resources (connection pools) and timeouts. It is also advisable to create distributed resources that you can configure as always active to provide more processing power, or as failover for situations of availability in case of disaster recovery, for example. An application where the number of required resources configured is very small and almost non-changeable, and no scalability is required, some other options exist in the market with less cost.
Read full review
Limelight's tech support and their attitude are tremendous. They are always available, willing to assist and quick. They are problem solvers with a can-do attitude.
Read full review
Pros
  • Layer seven attacks are becoming far more common. Traditionally it was always layered three, layer four, where you get an additional firewall, but with the application layer attacks become more frequent, more popular, et cetera. So having the web application firewall protecting us, and then with the recent Log4j, that's the most recent use case when it gave us that instant level of protection whilst we remediated the Log4j that we had that and the F5 Distributed Cloud WAF was protecting us.
  • I have a great relationship with the account manager, my account manager, and I think he drives the best price possible, um, for me, and I'm happy with that price.
  • F5 Distributed Cloud WAF is always innovating and evolving.
  • We run a very competitive proof value where we run numerous competitors against each other, and then we evaluate from that and then make the selection, and F5 Distributed Cloud WAF was the winner.
Read full review
  • I love that the weblogic dashboard allows you to manage applications and see the status of each application.
  • Oracle WebLogic Application Server simplifies usage periods in the development and production of business applications.
  • Oracle WebLogic Server allows me to define various aspects of data source entry, including creating a specific multiple connection to facilitate data entry.
  • Performance and administration are highlighted in weblogic.
Read full review
  • We used Limelight Networks (LLNW) for content storage and reporting. They continued to update and improve the platform. Their customer communication approach had evolved over the years to become very good.
  • We webcast live events throughout North America and abroad from multiple locations for multiple clients, simultaneously.
  • We built applications on top of LLNW infrastructure.
Read full review
Cons
  • Lack of warnings, currently the console does not provide a warning when deleting key-value entry.
  • The web GUI could use some tweaking, currently no undo option when removing exclusion rules.
  • Configuration complexity, currently menus and options are hidden, making it hard to configure vs on prem.
Read full review
  • The Admin UI should be further simplified, the UI design was not too user-friendly— too many options and clicks required, difficult for the new beginners to figure out what they are looking for.
  • The admin server becomes the single failure point, although Oracle suggested some workarounds by setting VIP and VHost, it was not quite easy and straight forward.
  • Domain replication is hard, requiring a lot of knowledge and scripts efforts.
  • Admin will hang if the node manager communication encounters some issues for one or some nodes in the domain/cluster.
  • Not able to kill/terminate the stuck thread, the only way is to restart the managed server (JVM)
  • License cost is too high, for small businesses.
Read full review
  • Streaming video issues
  • Poor top image selection
  • Easier to use timeline for clip navigation
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I would continue using F5 Distributed Cloud WAF because I am highly satisfied with its robust and comprehensive features that effectively protect our applications from evolving cyber threats. The advanced AI capabilities enhance threat detection and response, providing proactive security. Additionally, the excellent customer support ensures quick resolution of any issues, making the overall experience reliable and efficient. Trust in the manufacturer’s innovation and continuous updates further motivates me to keep this solution as a core part of our security infrastructure.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Usability
I believe is a solution that was designed from the start to be simple and easy to use. Coming from Imperva, it simply eased the burden and complexity of managing and securing our apps on different environments (cloud and on-prem). It easy to scale and very quick to deploy (as a cloud waf should be), provide us with DevOps integrations, visibility and automatic insights from multiple events that guarantee peace of mind for us analysts and opp managers.
Read full review
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Uplynk has improved greatly in the past year or so but still has some technical quirks that need to be worked out. i think with some improvements to speed and more stability in the program it could be an essential industry tool for our news station. Thank you for the improved performance to date.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Seems no issue
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Performance
Unnoticed slowness
Read full review
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I never contacted support for this product.
Read full review
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Online training saves me lots of time
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Just make sure you origin servers have F5 IPs allowed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It provides fewer false positives and a more granular approach to eliminating them, allowing us to focus on threats. Also, with the need to secure both on-premise and cloud-based web applications, we can only use Azure on the cloud part, but we still need to cover on-premise apps with WAF, so we would need to double the time to deploy and manage. Also, its flexibility of deployment scenarios offers us a faster time to deploy WAF without adjusting the app delivery process to WAF's existence.
Read full review
I wasn't involved in selecting the server we were using but in our team we've made some efforts to improve the local deployment process by trying some other Applicational servers too. Apache Tomcat was a more lightweight solution for sure, and it coped well with our applications needs, configuration and performance wise. Despite that, since we didn't got clearance to change that into our local servers, we kept using Weblogic to guarantee compliance between the testing environments and production.
Read full review
There is not a direct comparison between these products.
Read full review
Scalability
Dont see any issue so far
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It gives us peace of mind knowing that we have an easy way to mitigate any bad traffic coming to our websites and e-commerce. So it really gives us peace of mind. It doesn't affect the job projecting where the traffic is coming from. We actually have the bot functionality as well, so if there is any bot attacking our website, it automatically prevents it. So it's been pretty productive.
Read full review
  • It made it easy to handle over a 100 of deployments across multiple nodes every quarter.
  • It was easy to scale up our application to 36 nodes as the volume of transactions increased over the years.
  • Helped us achieve 99.999 availability for our users.
Read full review
  • Allows us to gain video views on our website
  • Allows for video to be clipped from broadcast to YouTube
  • Video archiving from television to digital
Read full review
ScreenShots

F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of