Fastly Next-Gen WAF vs. NGINX
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Fastly Secure (based on Signal Sciences, acquired December 2020), offers a WAF and RASP solution that protects over 34,000 applications and over a trillion production requests per month. Signal Sciences’ architecture is designed to provide organizations working in a modern development environment with comprehensive and scalable threat protection and security visibility. Additionally, Signal Sciences integrated BotSense service prevents bad bots from performing malicious actions against their… | N/A |
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | NGINX | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 49 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | NGINX | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF Score9.4 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF Score9.4 out of 10 | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.3 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |











