What users are saying about
2 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100
8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

FitNesse

FitNesse is great for scenarios where you would like to automate regression testing with basic user commands. For example, you can create a FitNesse script to log in as a user, click on a link to launch a process to fill out a form, and then sign out. FitNesse is not compatible with all Web interfaces, or rich text boxes.
Thapani Sawaengsri | TrustRadius Reviewer

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

It fits perfectly for SOA and EAI architecture with large numbers of services that required to be wired to each other, the binding virtualization is quite good to simply this part. For the simple scenario of orchestration and /or ESB architecture could be a better use traditional stack.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

SOA Governance

FitNesse
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
5.8
Service registry
FitNesse
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
5.0
Service management
FitNesse
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
7.0
Service discovery
FitNesse
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
6.0
Dependency management
FitNesse
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
7.0
Policy management
FitNesse
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
4.0

Pros

FitNesse

  • Easy to install.
  • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
  • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
Thapani Sawaengsri | TrustRadius Reviewer

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

  • reduce the number of http port required by services
  • simplified the binding connection amongst services
  • high scalability and fast deployment of applications
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

FitNesse

  • Limitations with rich text fields.
  • FitNesse cannot properly read the interface if labels or accessibility text is not available.
  • Not used for Web interface testing.
Thapani Sawaengsri | TrustRadius Reviewer

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

  • health check of services and application features has been released with a lot of bugs that have never been fixed
  • it is not so simple to apply the security policy to service/reference binding
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

FitNesse

No answers on this topic

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

TIBCO service grid has been chosen as a natural selection of the TIBCO product evolution. The high flexibility and the binding virtualization fits very well with client needs for its EAI applications due to the huge number of services and applications, the management of application dependencies during deployment, the advantage of perfect integration with EMS for logging
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

FitNesse

  • Saves developer time on regression testing.
  • Developers can spend time on other prioritizes while FitNesse runs regression testing.
  • Transitioning into another testing platform would be costly.
Thapani Sawaengsri | TrustRadius Reviewer

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

  • The integration of old BW with BWSE and its interface quite similar to design time has reduced the cost of training for developers
  • The TIBCO support for this product is no the best and clients complains too much about this. This required to find a workaround or force the client to move to new/or different product. Huge impact on ROI
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

FitNesse

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

FitNesse
7.0
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
7.0

Add comparison